Author Topic: Targeting  (Read 4607 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.


Offline James

  • *
  • Posts: 692
  • FAN REACTION: +7/-6
Re: Targeting
« Reply #1 on: October 21, 2018, 03:43:11 PM »

Offline Clear Lake ref

  • *
  • Posts: 233
  • FAN REACTION: +5/-2
  • Without officials... it is only recess.
Re: Targeting
« Reply #2 on: October 21, 2018, 03:53:48 PM »
Combine that with what the SEC picked up I don’t see how it was a target.

Offline Etref

  • Administrator
  • ***
  • Posts: 2364
  • FAN REACTION: +87/-29
  • " I don't make the rules coach!"
Re: Targeting
« Reply #3 on: October 21, 2018, 05:34:41 PM »
 ^no
" I don't make the rules coach!"

Offline JasonTX

  • *
  • Posts: 2985
  • FAN REACTION: +113/-59
Re: Targeting
« Reply #4 on: October 21, 2018, 07:17:27 PM »
Was this flagged on the field and confirmed by replay?

Offline scrounge

  • *
  • Posts: 228
  • FAN REACTION: +35/-23
  • Without officials... it is only recess.
Re: Targeting
« Reply #5 on: October 21, 2018, 09:12:15 PM »
I have no problem with that call

Offline TxBJ

  • *
  • Posts: 416
  • FAN REACTION: +10/-6
Re: Targeting
« Reply #6 on: October 22, 2018, 12:18:01 PM »
Was this flagged on the field and confirmed by replay?
Yes.

Offline DallasLJ

  • *
  • Posts: 568
  • FAN REACTION: +16/-15
Re: Targeting
« Reply #7 on: October 22, 2018, 12:43:41 PM »
I'm okay with the call.  Defender is responsible for how he hits the QB -- who was clearly a "defenseless player".  Came in with head lowered -- towards the head of the QB.  When in doubt its Targeting.

Offline Sonofanump

  • *
  • Posts: 327
  • FAN REACTION: +8/-3
Re: Targeting
« Reply #8 on: October 22, 2018, 12:52:52 PM »
I don't think it's 9.1.3.  Looks like facemask to facemask.
It is kinda of a weird little launch he does up.  It's an indicator.
Defenseless.  Forceable.  I bet that 9.1.4 gets supported.