We always have a choice. We can/should look at every situation for a specific violation of a specific rule, as well as render a judgment as to whether, what we are actually observing, does or does not, actually rise to the level of violating any specific rules that monitor the general behavior and tenor of the rules, such as 2-16-b or c, 9-4-3b, c or g.
In the absence of exactly specific rule coverage and specification to address, detail and enumerate every potential violation, enforcement is often dependent on the specific action being observed and the judgment of the covering official and their understanding of the protective intent of multiple rules, while evaluating whether the action being observed threatens any of the protective restrictions of the rules, to the extent that a formal consequence is justified and appropriate.
Limiting the appropriate response, of observed actions, to the presence, or absence, of exact and specific inclusion and specification in the actual text of a/any rule is impossible and conflicts with the NFHS "Game Officials Manual" instruction, "Game officials must have a football sense which supersedes the technical application of the rules so that the game goes smoothly. Game officials are expected to exercise good judgment in applying the rules.", which will NEVER be able to specify and/or enumerate EVERY possible violation.