Author Topic: NFHS 2022 Rule Changes  (Read 30621 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline BIG DON

  • Administrator
  • ***
  • Posts: 495
  • FAN REACTION: +53/-0
NFHS 2022 Rule Changes
« on: February 17, 2022, 01:23:59 PM »
Source NFHS Web Site

A new rules exception that allows a passer to intentionally throw an incomplete forward pass for the purpose of conserving yardage, and the redefining of the term “chop block” – both of which are intended to minimize risk of injury – are the two most notable rules changes coming to high school football for the 2022 season.

These changes stand out among the seven total recommendations brought forth by the National Federation of State High School Associations (NFHS) Football Rules Committee, which held its annual rules meeting January 23-25 at the Conrad Hotel in downtown Indianapolis. The NFHS Board of Directors subsequently approved all seven of the committee’s suggestions.

“With this year’s rules changes, the committee once again showed its focus on minimizing risk in high school football,” said Bob Colgate, NFHS Director of Sports and Sports Medicine and liaison to the NFHS Football Rules Committee. “By expanding the parameters for a legal forward pass and redefining the chop block so it can be more easily officiated by game officials, the committee has taken measures to mitigate two potentially risky situations within the game.”

Rule 7-5-2 EXCEPTION 2 now permits a player to purposefully throw an incomplete forward pass without warranting an intentional grounding penalty provided the passer is outside of “the pocket” (lateral boundary of the free-blocking zone) and the pass reaches the neutral zone or the extension of the neutral zone beyond the sideline.

“The question (with this rule) has always been, ‘if the defense makes a good play, are we bailing out the offense by letting the quarterback throw the ball away?’” said Richard McWhirter, Chair of the NFHS Football Rules Committee and Assistant Executive Director of the Tennessee Secondary School Athletic Association. “This year, I think the committee felt the wellbeing of the passers and not subjecting them to extra hits was worth changing the rule.”

An alteration to Rule 2-3-8 addressed the new definition of a chop block, which is now described as “a combination block by two or more teammates against an opponent other than the runner, with or without delay, where one of the blocks is below the waist and one of the blocks is above the waist.” Previously, the defensive player’s knee was used to determine the high and low components of a chop block.

“This is going to strengthen the rule and it’s also going to help the game officials,” said McWhirter. “I think they're going to be able to enforce this rule better than they have in the past because determining ‘below the knee’ and ‘above the knee’ is tough to do. I think it’s really going to improve the game.”

Players will be able to wear the number 0 as a jersey number starting in 2022, as the range of acceptable numbers listed in Rule 1-4-3 was expanded from 1-99 to 0-99. However, any number preceded by the digit zero will be illegal.

State associations now have the option to extend sideline team boxes beyond their traditional 50-yard expanse (between the 25-yard-lines) as long as both teams are allowed to use the same dimensions. This new NOTE attached to Rule 1-2-3g also gives state associations the freedom to decide which individuals can access the extended area.

Two minor changes involving game clock and play clock procedures were made to Rules 3-4-7 and 3-6-1a(1)e EXCEPTIONS, respectively.

In Rule 3-4-7, any foul committed within the last two minutes of either half will automatically result in the offended team’s option to start the game clock on the snap. Prior to this change, the offended team was required to accept its opponent’s penalty in order to gain control of the game clock.

The committee edited the EXCEPTIONS to Rule 3-6-1a(1)e, which clarify the necessary conditions for an abbreviated 25-second play clock after a stoppage in play. This rule now includes an exception for Rule 3-5-7i, mandating that a 40-second play clock be employed following a foul committed only by the defensive team. 

The final rule change for 2022 is an alteration to Rule 1-3-3 regarding game equipment. Any game official – not just the referee – may order the ball changed between downs.

The NFHS Football Rules Committee is composed of one representative from each of the NFHS member state associations that use NFHS football rules, along with a representative from the NFHS Coaches Association, NFHS Officials Association and NFHS Sports Medicine Advisory Committee.

A complete listing of the football rules changes will be available on the NFHS website at www.nfhs.org. Click on “Activities & Sports” at the top of the home page and select “Football.”

According to the most recent NFHS High School Athletics Participation Survey, 11-player football is the most popular high school sport for boys with 1,006,013 participants in 14,247 schools nationwide. In addition, there were 31,221 boys who participated in 6-, 8- and 9-player football, along with 2,604 girls in all four versions of the game for a grand total of 1,039,828.
do or do not there is no try

Offline ncwingman

  • *
  • Posts: 1499
  • FAN REACTION: +79/-22
  • Without officials... it is only recess.
Re: NFHS 2022 Rule Changes
« Reply #1 on: February 17, 2022, 01:33:20 PM »
I just posted this in the other thread, but my attempt at summarizing the wall of text:

1. We now have a "pocket" that the QB can be outside of.
2. Chop blocks are above/below the waist instead of the knee
3. Fouls under 2 minutes can allow for the clock to start on the snap, even if declined.
4. Play clock at 40 if *and only if* there is a defensive foul. Fouls by both means 25.
5. Any official can say, "Hey, give me a clean/dry/new ball"

The more technical changes:

1. Players can wear 0, but not 00 or 02.
2. Team boxes can be extended by state adoption.

Offline BIG DON

  • Administrator
  • ***
  • Posts: 495
  • FAN REACTION: +53/-0
Re: NFHS 2022 Rule Changes
« Reply #2 on: February 17, 2022, 01:42:08 PM »
I just posted this in the other thread, but my attempt at summarizing the wall of text:

1. We now have a "pocket" that the QB can be outside of.
2. Chop blocks are above/below the waist instead of the knee
3. Fouls under 2 minutes can allow for the clock to start on the snap, even if declined.
4. Play clock at 40 if *and only if* there is a defensive foul. Fouls by both means 25.
5. Any official can say, "Hey, give me a clean/dry/new ball"

The more technical changes:

1. Players can wear 0, but not 00 or 02.
2. Team boxes can be extended by state adoption.

Does anyone see any problems that we may have with these changes?
do or do not there is no try

Offline KWH

  • *
  • Posts: 732
  • FAN REACTION: +641/-114
  • See it, Think about it, Pass on it if possible!
Re: NFHS 2022 Rule Changes
« Reply #3 on: February 17, 2022, 02:09:01 PM »
Does anyone see any problems that we may have with these changes?

We will need to make some mechanical changes?
SEE everything that you CALL, but; Don't CALL everything you SEE!
Never let the Rules Book get in the way of a great ball game!

Respectfully Submitted;
Some guy on a message forum

Offline HLinNC

  • *
  • Posts: 3491
  • FAN REACTION: +133/-24
Re: NFHS 2022 Rule Changes
« Reply #4 on: February 17, 2022, 03:03:54 PM »
Yep- Crew Huddle- "Anybody see the ball get back to the LOS?"

BJ- "Nope, my guy ran post.
LJ- "Geez, I had trips on my side."
HL- "My guy ran a corner route."

Offline KWH

  • *
  • Posts: 732
  • FAN REACTION: +641/-114
  • See it, Think about it, Pass on it if possible!
Re: NFHS 2022 Rule Changes
« Reply #5 on: February 17, 2022, 03:15:33 PM »
Yep- Crew Huddle- "Anybody see the ball get back to the LOS?"

BJ- "Nope, my guy ran post.
LJ- "Geez, I had trips on my side."
HL- "My guy ran a corner route."

Well I can only tell you this, in the three experimental states - Iowa (2 years); Hawai'i (1 year); and Oregon (1 year) That issue was never reported.
SEE everything that you CALL, but; Don't CALL everything you SEE!
Never let the Rules Book get in the way of a great ball game!

Respectfully Submitted;
Some guy on a message forum

Offline ncwingman

  • *
  • Posts: 1499
  • FAN REACTION: +79/-22
  • Without officials... it is only recess.
Re: NFHS 2022 Rule Changes
« Reply #6 on: February 17, 2022, 05:40:57 PM »
I have to say I'm not a huge fan of that particular change, but I think the mechanics issue won't be the sky falling scenario here.

The question will be the "When in Doubt" line -- QBs should be told to make it obvious, but if it's close do you give him the benefit of the doubt or not? As long as that guidance is clear, we'll be fine.

Offline JasonTX

  • *
  • Posts: 3002
  • FAN REACTION: +114/-59
Re: NFHS 2022 Rule Changes
« Reply #7 on: February 17, 2022, 08:12:21 PM »
Ya'll keep messing around and you'll be working with NCAA rules.  These are pretty close.

Offline bjfb

  • *
  • Posts: 32
  • FAN REACTION: +2/-2
Re: NFHS 2022 Rule Changes
« Reply #8 on: February 18, 2022, 06:40:05 AM »
I have a general idea how this will be handled mechanically with a five man crew, but would be interested to hear from Iowa, Hawai'i, and Oregon officials on their mechanics.

Online ElvisLives

  • *
  • Posts: 4632
  • FAN REACTION: +188/-188
  • The rules are there if you need them.
Re: NFHS 2022 Rule Changes
« Reply #9 on: February 18, 2022, 07:02:09 AM »
I have a general idea how this will be handled mechanically with a five man crew, but would be interested to hear from Iowa, Hawai'i, and Oregon officials on their mechanics.

Regarding ING, we’ve been doing it with 5 for many years. Our H is simply good enough to check the flight of the ball and know what’s happening with players in his area of primary responsibility. Yeah, it takes some practice, but you can get there, once you get past the fear of change.

Offline Ralph Damren

  • *
  • Posts: 5138
  • FAN REACTION: +875/-28
  • SEE IT-THINK IT-CALL IT
Re: NFHS 2022 Rule Changes
« Reply #10 on: February 18, 2022, 08:30:32 AM »
Ya'll keep messing around and you'll be working with NCAA rules.  These are pretty close.
I would miss my trips to windy Indy as, even though, NCAA also lives there ; I believe the coaches write their rules  ;D....

Oh, by the way I responded to the new rules under the 'false flag' topic in error. If anyone knows how to move it over here, be my guess. ^no

Offline toma

  • *
  • Posts: 110
  • FAN REACTION: +3/-1
Re: NFHS 2022 Rule Changes
« Reply #11 on: February 18, 2022, 10:32:43 AM »
In Mass when we were using NCAA before coming over to the dark side (NFHS) the QB dumping the ball outside the pocket wasn't a problem. Wings & BJ understood they need to help out ID-ing a receiver in the area. Most QB's would try get it OOB's beyond the previous spot. R would hold the spot where ball was thrown and look for help. did it make LOS extended, NO ^flag, any receive within reason in the area NO ^flag. 
 

Offline ncwingman

  • *
  • Posts: 1499
  • FAN REACTION: +79/-22
  • Without officials... it is only recess.
Re: NFHS 2022 Rule Changes
« Reply #12 on: February 18, 2022, 10:54:07 AM »
I could have sworn that there was a rule stating that non-integer numbers were not allowed, but I am coming up empty -- even checking NCAA and NFL rules.

NFHS does specify Arabic numerals, so you can't be XVII, or some transcendental number like π or e, but there's nothing specifically prohibiting √2 or 9/5? The new rule does prohibit a leading zero, so you can't be 0.15, but you could be 1.5?

Of course the answer is "Don't be ridiculous", but there's nothing in the rules that says a dog *can't* play football...

Offline Ralph Damren

  • *
  • Posts: 5138
  • FAN REACTION: +875/-28
  • SEE IT-THINK IT-CALL IT
Re: NFHS 2022 Rule Changes
« Reply #13 on: February 18, 2022, 10:58:15 AM »
I have to say I'm not a huge fan of that particular change, but I think the mechanics issue won't be the sky falling scenario here.

The question will be the "When in Doubt" line -- QBs should be told to make it obvious, but if it's close do you give him the benefit of the doubt or not? As long as that guidance is clear, we'll be fine.
As in our national justice system, "Must be guilty beyond a reasonable doubt" if you can't tell, it's just an incomplete. The LOS requirement is to prevent the QB from spiking the ball. Only the player that lines up directly behind the snapper can do this, so a runner on a sweep can't pull and ground a pass if things don't look well. Also a scrambling QB can't be flagged if he leaves the FBZ extended, but returns to it before passing.

Offline SCline

  • *
  • Posts: 151
  • FAN REACTION: +8/-2
Re: NFHS 2022 Rule Changes
« Reply #14 on: February 18, 2022, 11:38:43 AM »
Never mind
« Last Edit: February 18, 2022, 11:49:20 AM by SCline »

Offline ncwingman

  • *
  • Posts: 1499
  • FAN REACTION: +79/-22
  • Without officials... it is only recess.
Re: NFHS 2022 Rule Changes
« Reply #15 on: February 18, 2022, 11:40:44 AM »
As in our national justice system, "Must be guilty beyond a reasonable doubt" if you can't tell, it's just an incomplete. The LOS requirement is to prevent the QB from spiking the ball. Only the player that lines up directly behind the snapper can do this, so a runner on a sweep can't pull and ground a pass if things don't look well. Also a scrambling QB can't be flagged if he leaves the FBZ extended, but returns to it before passing.

Mechanically, the issue will be if the ball is close to the LOS and the wings have drifted downfield. If it's obviously short or obviously over, there shouldn't be an issue. I would imagine the intent is to allow for the benefit of the doubt as well, but it's more important to have a clearly defined "if it's close" scenario rather than trying to split hairs about being a foot short of the LOS.

I'm also curious about how "the player that lines up directly behind the snapper" is worded in terms of technicalities. If you have an I formation, do you have three players lined up directly behind the snapper? You could include "and receives the snap", but then you have to define if that includes muffing the snap, or if a jet sweep in motion "intercepts" the snap was he "lined up" there? Of course, I'm trying to poke holes in a rule I haven't fully seen, so this may already be accounted for and moot.

Offline Ralph Damren

  • *
  • Posts: 5138
  • FAN REACTION: +875/-28
  • SEE IT-THINK IT-CALL IT
Re: NFHS 2022 Rule Changes
« Reply #16 on: February 18, 2022, 11:56:29 AM »
I could have sworn that there was a rule stating that non-integer numbers were not allowed, but I am coming up empty -- even checking NCAA and NFL rules.

NFHS does specify Arabic numerals, so you can't be XVII, or some transcendental number like π or e, but there's nothing specifically prohibiting √2 or 9/5? The new rule does prohibit a leading zero, so you can't be 0.15, but you could be 1.5?

Of course the answer is "Don't be ridiculous", but there's nothing in the rules that says a dog *can't* play football...
Understand your dilemma of possible fractions appearing on jerseys. A valid concern would be a player numbered 49 7/8. Where it is closer to 50 than 49, would he still be an eligible receiver  :!# :o ???  While a dog might be able to play in the NFL, College and high school players usually need to have good grades and dog show aerobatics shouldn't count. A good fetchin' dawg could be allowed to replace some ballboys and be fitted with a doggie sweater with school colors. If dogs are allowed to play, a face mask wouldn't be required but a muzzle would. A tail pad would be optional. If I could choose from the mammal kingdom, a giraffe could be useful in blocking kicks and such -as long as it didn't mind getting hit in it's head by the football.

This reminds me, it's time to walk ma' dawg. tR:oLl

Offline ncwingman

  • *
  • Posts: 1499
  • FAN REACTION: +79/-22
  • Without officials... it is only recess.
Re: NFHS 2022 Rule Changes
« Reply #17 on: February 18, 2022, 12:13:28 PM »
Understand your dilemma of possible fractions appearing on jerseys. A valid concern would be a player numbered 49 7/8. Where it is closer to 50 than 49, would he still be an eligible receiver  :!# :o ??? 

He's in the numerical equivalent of No Man's Land. Eligible receivers must wear numbers from 0-49 or 80-99. Any number between 49 and 80 is ineligible, so 49 7/8 would be an ineligible number. However, there must be at least five linemen numbered 50-79, and 49 7/8 is not within that interval, so he could not assist in meeting that numbering requirement either.

The more practical issue I'd have is that each number must be of a specific size on the jersey and unless he's got an XXXXXL jersey, there may not be enough area for all four digits and a space. If you crowded the digits, it may be confused with 497/8 which would be a legal lineman number (62.125). If you're going to have a fractional number, you might have to stick to a single digit numerator and denominator.

Offline ILRef

  • *
  • Posts: 3
  • FAN REACTION: +0/-1
  • Without officials... it is only recess.
Re: NFHS 2022 Rule Changes
« Reply #18 on: February 18, 2022, 01:03:26 PM »
A few observations regarding the new intentional grounding exception --

1.  Unlike NCAA and NFL, any player can throw the ball incomplete to avoid the loss of yardage - this theoretically includes a running back that runs a slant or sweep that is going to be stopped in the backfield for a loss.

2.  The new rule is an exception to the illegal forward pass rule, meaning throwing the ball to the neutral zone from outside the pocket is now a legal forward pass. This also means that the player that throws the ball meets the definition of passer and gets roughing the passer protection.  A personal foul against the the passer also carries an automatic first down.  It seems like the offense is now getting a second benefit from this rule.  The offense can throw a pass to avoid loss of yardage and get an automatic first down for a personal foul that was otherwise just a 15 yard penalty.  Seems like a double benefit to the offense.

3.  Any thoughts on how "outside" the lateral boundary of the free block zone will be determined?  Both feet outside the boundary?  One foot outside boundary?  The ball is released outside the boundary (regardless of foot position)?  It seems like the Rs are going to have quite a time making that judgment at game speed.  I would hope for a fairly broad application that errors on the side of putting the passer outside the zone as soon as possible.

Offline KWH

  • *
  • Posts: 732
  • FAN REACTION: +641/-114
  • See it, Think about it, Pass on it if possible!
Re: NFHS 2022 Rule Changes
« Reply #19 on: February 18, 2022, 01:03:56 PM »
I have a general idea how this will be handled mechanically with a five man crew, but would be interested to hear from Iowa, Hawai'i, and Oregon officials on their mechanics.

There will be a simplified and illustrated video coming out soon.
SEE everything that you CALL, but; Don't CALL everything you SEE!
Never let the Rules Book get in the way of a great ball game!

Respectfully Submitted;
Some guy on a message forum

Offline KWH

  • *
  • Posts: 732
  • FAN REACTION: +641/-114
  • See it, Think about it, Pass on it if possible!
Re: NFHS 2022 Rule Changes
« Reply #20 on: February 18, 2022, 01:09:39 PM »
A few observations regarding the new intentional grounding exception --

1.  Unlike NCAA and NFL, any player can throw the ball incomplete to avoid the loss of yardage - this theoretically includes a running back that runs a slant or sweep that is going to be stopped in the backfield for a loss.

2.  The new rule is an exception to the illegal forward pass rule, meaning throwing the ball to the neutral zone from outside the pocket is now a legal forward pass. This also means that the player that throws the ball meets the definition of passer and gets roughing the passer protection.  A personal foul against the the passer also carries an automatic first down.  It seems like the offense is now getting a second benefit from this rule.  The offense can throw a pass to avoid loss of yardage and get an automatic first down for a personal foul that was otherwise just a 15 yard penalty.  Seems like a double benefit to the offense.

3.  Any thoughts on how "outside" the lateral boundary of the free block zone will be determined?  Both feet outside the boundary?  One foot outside boundary?  The ball is released outside the boundary (regardless of foot position)?  It seems like the Rs are going to have quite a time making that judgment at game speed.  I would hope for a fairly broad application that errors on the side of putting the passer outside the zone as soon as possible.

There will be a training video coming out soon and there will be a POE in the 2022-23 NFHS Game Officials Manual
SEE everything that you CALL, but; Don't CALL everything you SEE!
Never let the Rules Book get in the way of a great ball game!

Respectfully Submitted;
Some guy on a message forum

Offline ILRef

  • *
  • Posts: 3
  • FAN REACTION: +0/-1
  • Without officials... it is only recess.
Re: NFHS 2022 Rule Changes
« Reply #21 on: February 18, 2022, 01:21:01 PM »
Who is working on the training video?

Offline riffraft

  • *
  • Posts: 346
  • FAN REACTION: +19/-19
Re: NFHS 2022 Rule Changes
« Reply #22 on: February 18, 2022, 03:39:43 PM »
I am probably the contra voice in this, even my crew mates disagree with me.

I think the out of the pocket you can ground the ball is completely unnecessary (Solving a problem that doesn't exist), Too much in favor of the offense and just further complicates thing for us officials, particularly in 5-man.

Offline stevegarbs

  • *
  • Posts: 131
  • FAN REACTION: +4/-2
Re: NFHS 2022 Rule Changes
« Reply #23 on: February 18, 2022, 03:44:37 PM »
I could have sworn that there was a rule stating that non-integer numbers were not allowed, but I am coming up empty -- even checking NCAA and NFL rules.

NFHS does specify Arabic numerals, so you can't be XVII, or some transcendental number like π or e, but there's nothing specifically prohibiting √2 or 9/5? The new rule does prohibit a leading zero, so you can't be 0.15, but you could be 1.5?

Of course the answer is "Don't be ridiculous", but there's nothing in the rules that says a dog *can't* play football...


I have to admit I did not have "transcendental number" on my "Things you might see in a Refstripes post" bingo card....

Offline HLinNC

  • *
  • Posts: 3491
  • FAN REACTION: +133/-24
Re: NFHS 2022 Rule Changes
« Reply #24 on: February 18, 2022, 07:26:12 PM »
Quote
I think the out of the pocket you can ground the ball is completely unnecessary (Solving a problem that doesn't exist), Too much in favor of the offense and just further complicates thing for us officials, particularly in 5-man.

I don't disagree.