Author Topic: New IG Rule  (Read 7879 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Curious

  • *
  • Posts: 1314
  • FAN REACTION: +36/-50
New IG Rule
« on: June 14, 2022, 12:46:56 PM »
One of the two "conditions" for a pass to be legally intentionally thrown incomplete is that the pass must "reach the neutral zone or the extension of the NZ beyond the sideline". My question is what if the pass does not reach the NZ because it its tipped by B behind the LOS?  I recognize that eligibility restrictions for A are "off"; but does B's touching absolve A from not reaching the NZ with the pass?

Offline Etref

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 2423
  • FAN REACTION: +88/-29
  • " I don't make the rules coach!"
Re: New IG Rule
« Reply #1 on: June 14, 2022, 12:52:24 PM »
In NCAA it does, sounds like this rule copies the NCAA version.
" I don't make the rules coach!"

Offline Ralph Damren

  • *
  • Posts: 5138
  • FAN REACTION: +875/-28
  • SEE IT-THINK IT-CALL IT
Re: New IG Rule
« Reply #2 on: June 14, 2022, 01:30:31 PM »
Once B touches the pass behind the LOS all bets are off for IR, IG, OPI, etc. Big ole' Bubba (OL) can grab 'er and waddle for a TD.As I understand it, the differences from NCAA are no need for any eligible receiver to be in town and the free blocking zone is used in lieu of the tackle box to accommodate 6, 8 & 9-man that have a more narrow FBZ.

Offline CalhounLJ

  • *
  • Posts: 3044
  • FAN REACTION: +141/-1010
  • Without officials... it is only recess.
Re: New IG Rule
« Reply #3 on: June 14, 2022, 03:57:24 PM »
One of the two "conditions" for a pass to be legally intentionally thrown incomplete is that the pass must "reach the neutral zone or the extension of the NZ beyond the sideline". My question is what if the pass does not reach the NZ because it its tipped by B behind the LOS?  I recognize that eligibility restrictions for A are "off"; but does B's touching absolve A from not reaching the NZ with the pass?
Short answer, yes.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Offline bossman72

  • *
  • Posts: 2374
  • FAN REACTION: +312/-29
Re: New IG Rule
« Reply #4 on: June 18, 2022, 10:09:44 AM »
One of the two "conditions" for a pass to be legally intentionally thrown incomplete is that the pass must "reach the neutral zone or the extension of the NZ beyond the sideline". My question is what if the pass does not reach the NZ because it its tipped by B behind the LOS?  I recognize that eligibility restrictions for A are "off"; but does B's touching absolve A from not reaching the NZ with the pass?

Pretend this is last year.  If the ball gets tipped near the QB and the ball lands nowhere near an eligible receiver, were you going to get him for ING?

Offline Grant - AR

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 505
  • FAN REACTION: +65/-6
Re: New IG Rule
« Reply #5 on: July 26, 2022, 07:04:05 AM »
It look like we have been invaded by a troll (AustinLevi) here in our little world!

I just deleted his posts and banned him.  ^no

Offline CalhounLJ

  • *
  • Posts: 3044
  • FAN REACTION: +141/-1010
  • Without officials... it is only recess.
Re: New IG Rule
« Reply #6 on: July 26, 2022, 08:30:03 AM »
I just deleted his posts and banned him.  ^no
^good ^good ^good ^good ^good ^good

Offline Ralph Damren

  • *
  • Posts: 5138
  • FAN REACTION: +875/-28
  • SEE IT-THINK IT-CALL IT
Re: New IG Rule
« Reply #7 on: July 26, 2022, 09:02:21 AM »
I just deleted his posts and banned him.  ^no
Thanks, Grant, I was about to give him/her/it the "Welcome to the forum....." speil  tiphat:

Offline Line_Judge

  • *
  • Posts: 8
  • FAN REACTION: +1/-0
  • Without officials... it is only recess.
Re: New IG Rule
« Reply #8 on: August 02, 2022, 11:52:00 AM »
For those interested, I found a video that goes over the new NFHS rule changes and applies them to videos.  The person goes over the ING rule in it and how to handle it.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=54R_W-WTo6o

There are also some videos that are good reminders and plays.

Offline HLinNC

  • *
  • Posts: 3491
  • FAN REACTION: +133/-24
Re: New IG Rule
« Reply #9 on: August 02, 2022, 12:07:11 PM »
That official is in the ACC and on the NFL development list I believe.