Author Topic: 2025 NCAA Proposed Rule Changes  (Read 8763 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline ETXZebra

  • *
  • Posts: 437
  • FAN REACTION: +18/-7
2025 NCAA Proposed Rule Changes
« on: February 28, 2025, 11:07:20 AM »
The NCAA Football Rules Committee on Friday proposed modifications to the injury timeout rules for the 2025-26 season.

Committee members, who met in Indianapolis this week, recommended that if medical personnel enter the field to evaluate an injured player after the ball is spotted by the officiating crew for the next play, that player's team would be charged a timeout.

If the team does not have any timeouts remaining, a 5-yard delay-of-game penalty would be assessed.

Before becoming official, all rule changes must be approved by the NCAA Playing Rules Oversight Panel, which is scheduled to discuss football rules proposals April 16.

The injury timeout proposal was made after many in the NCAA college football community raised concerns about strategies in which players fake an injury to stop the opposition's momentum or to avoid using an allotted timeout.

This has been a topic of discussion for the NCAA Football Rules Committee in recent years. Before the 2021 season, a framework was instituted that allows a school or conference to request a postgame video review headed by Steve Shaw, the NCAA secretary-rules editor/national coordinator of officials, regarding questionable actions involving injuries.

If it is determined that a player faked an injury to manipulate the rules, the offending team's conference is notified, and any possible disciplinary action can be made by the conference office.

The impetus for recommending this change is to provide an in-game mechanism that can curtail the faking of injuries because committee members think these actions negatively affect the overall perception of the game.

"The committee identified the time period after the ball has been spotted as the most egregious violations of the injury timeout rule and is addressing the issue this way," said Kirby Smart, co-chair of the committee and coach at Georgia. "Having a set time frame of when the game is stopped for an injured player should hopefully help curtail the strategy of having players fake injuries."

Overtime timeouts

Committee members also proposed that if a game reaches a third overtime, each team would have one timeout to use until the game is concluded.

Currently, teams are allotted one timeout for each overtime period. At the start of the third overtime, teams alternate running 2-point plays until a winner is decided.

Committee members don't think the game should be stopped for timeouts when there are only two plays per extra period if a game reaches a third overtime.

Other rule proposals

The Football Rules Committee:

Recommended that when the decision on instant replay is announced, the referee say only that the call on the field is "upheld" or "overturned." The terms "confirmed" and "stands" would not be used.

Proposed that no player be in the direct line of the snap to the potential kicker on punts. No player could be within the frame of the snapper. It would be an illegal formation if the team doesn't have the required number of players on the line. Also, if the snapper is on the end of the line by formation, the snapper would lose scrimmage kick protection, and the opposition could line a player over the snapper.

Recommended if any player on a kickoff-return team makes a "T" signal during the kick, the play would be whistled dead.
Proposed enhanced rules regarding words or signals that distract opponents when they are preparing to put the ball in play. No player could call defensive signals that simulate the sound or cadence of the offensive signals. The defensive terms "move" and "stem" would be reserved for players on that side of the ball and could not be used by the offense.

Recommended that after the two-minute timeout in either half, if the defense commits a foul with 12 or more players on the field and they participate in the play, the officials would administer a 5-yard penalty. The offensive team would have the option to reset the game clock back to the time at the start of the play. If the 12th player is attempting to leave the field and has no influence on the play, the defensive team would be penalized 5 yards with no adjustment to the game clock.

Proposed that coach-to-player communication, similar to technology implemented for the Football Bowl Subdivision last year, be permissive for teams that compete in the Football Championship Subdivision.

Targeting

The committee had a thorough discussion about player health and safety, including the targeting rule. The committee will seek conference commissioner feedback and further discussion on player safety rules.

Offline TampaSteve

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 1536
  • FAN REACTION: +24/-13
Re: 2025 NCAA Proposed Rule Changes
« Reply #1 on: February 28, 2025, 11:38:26 AM »
medical personnel entering the field "...after the ball is spotted" is an interesting caveat.
It would seem to reduce this ploy, but would not seem to all out eliminate it.
i.e. those that employ this strategy can tell the players: if they get 1/10 here, a db will go down as the play is being blown dead.
I heard a proposal that if a player goes down then he must sit out the remainder of that drive. - which seems an effective deterrent too. 

reminds me of a hockey player commenting after a player went down, game stoppage and medical personnel on the ice.  Opposing player said "I'll tell ya eh, they must have some remarkable doctors in MTL. this guy was on the ice and had to be helped off.  And he didn't even miss a shift."
(Subban was the guy who took a dive. somehow, he got what was coming to him the remainder if that game)
« Last Edit: February 28, 2025, 11:46:22 AM by TampaSteve »

Offline dammitbobby

  • *
  • Posts: 1743
  • FAN REACTION: +38/-12
  • Exceed the standard... or don't do the job
Re: 2025 NCAA Proposed Rule Changes
« Reply #2 on: February 28, 2025, 01:02:38 PM »
That's an interesting solution to the problem. But like TampaSteve said, it's not going to eliminate it - it's going to encourgae more coordinated attempts to get medical personnel on the field before the ball is set, which can put officials in a bit of bind: you have medical personnel coming onto the field immediately after the ball is dead and before injury timeout is signaled - are you going to make them leave?

'Proposed that no player be in the direct line of the snap to the potential kicker on punts. No player could be within the frame of the snapper. It would be an illegal formation if the team doesn't have the required number of players on the line.'

If I'm understanding this correctly, this eliminates lining up in a SKF and then shifting to a normal offensive formation to take advantage of the fact that the center is uncovered and try to run right up the middle? 

If that's correct, this is a very good rule change. While I personally have not seen this happen, I do know of at least one team in our area that does this, or has done this (at the HS level) on tries... would like to see it expanded to cover that as well.

Offline bama_stripes

  • *
  • Posts: 3170
  • FAN REACTION: +126/-29
Re: 2025 NCAA Proposed Rule Changes
« Reply #3 on: March 01, 2025, 06:47:24 AM »
Quote
Recommended if any player on a kickoff-return team makes a "T" signal during the kick, the play would be whistled dead.

Pardon my ignorance, but what is this meant to prevent?

Offline ilyazhito

  • *
  • Posts: 468
  • FAN REACTION: +14/-24
  • Without officials... it is only recess.
Re: 2025 NCAA Proposed Rule Changes
« Reply #4 on: March 01, 2025, 06:53:27 AM »
The "T signal" is a signal to get away from the ball. I have seen it on punts when the return team does not want their own player to touch a bouncing kick and make the other team eligible to recover the ball. I believe that the NCAA rules committee wants to blow dead any play where the return team gives signals that confuse the opponents into believing that the play will be dead.

Offline bossman72

  • *
  • Posts: 2338
  • FAN REACTION: +310/-29
Re: 2025 NCAA Proposed Rule Changes
« Reply #5 on: March 01, 2025, 09:29:13 PM »
Pardon my ignorance, but what is this meant to prevent?

The off-returner will stick his arms straight out to signal the other returner to take a touchback.
I'm not sure why they needed a rule change, they could have interpreted it as an invalid signal like they did with the get away signal.

Offline bama_stripes

  • *
  • Posts: 3170
  • FAN REACTION: +126/-29
Re: 2025 NCAA Proposed Rule Changes
« Reply #6 on: March 02, 2025, 06:39:53 AM »
OK, thanks.

I predicted several years ago that, within one generation, there would be no more kicking in football other than FGs and XPs.  It may not take that long.

Offline ElvisLives

  • *
  • Posts: 4529
  • FAN REACTION: +187/-187
  • The rules are there if you need them.
Re: 2025 NCAA Proposed Rule Changes
« Reply #7 on: March 02, 2025, 11:52:31 AM »
The off-returner will stick his arms straight out to signal the other returner to take a touchback.
I'm not sure why they needed a rule change, they could have interpreted it as an invalid signal like they did with the get away signal.

The T signal is static, and the get away signal is dynamic (involving some level of ‘waving’). They restricted waving signals, so an interpretation of the get away as being an invalid signal fits the model. A static signal didn’t, so a rule change will correct that. But I wonder if it will extend to the forward static pointing, as well?
Somebody ask, as soon as you can.
« Last Edit: March 05, 2025, 09:12:04 AM by ElvisLives »

Offline chaoslord

  • *
  • Posts: 19
  • FAN REACTION: +2/-2
  • Without officials... it is only recess.
Re: 2025 NCAA Proposed Rule Changes
« Reply #8 on: March 04, 2025, 11:17:25 AM »
Pardon my ignorance, but what is this meant to prevent?

Few days late but it's meant to prevent the blow up from the South Carolina / Illinois Citrus bowl game where a SCAR returner did the T but then caught the ball and threw it to another returner. It caused a flash point with the coaches later in the game when Bielema, checking on an injured player near the SCAR sideline, did the T symbol toward Beamer before walking away iirc. So, in one word: gamesmanship. They dont want players having to decide "is it ok to let up or am I getting tricked" on kickoffs

Offline Imperial Stout

  • *
  • Posts: 57
  • FAN REACTION: +2/-1
  • Without officials... it is only recess.
Re: 2025 NCAA Proposed Rule Changes
« Reply #9 on: March 05, 2025, 12:55:46 PM »
medical personnel entering the field "...after the ball is spotted" is an interesting caveat.
It would seem to reduce this ploy, but would not seem to all out eliminate it.
i.e. those that employ this strategy can tell the players: if they get 1/10 here, a db will go down as the play is being blown dead.
I heard a proposal that if a player goes down then he must sit out the remainder of that drive. - which seems an effective deterrent too. 

reminds me of a hockey player commenting after a player went down, game stoppage and medical personnel on the ice.  Opposing player said "I'll tell ya eh, they must have some remarkable doctors in MTL. this guy was on the ice and had to be helped off.  And he didn't even miss a shift."
(Subban was the guy who took a dive. somehow, he got what was coming to him the remainder if that game)

Curious why they added the "when medical team enters the field" caveat. So if a player goes down, gets the injury timeout, gets up and limps off the field, everything is ok?

Offline Morningrise

  • *
  • Posts: 625
  • FAN REACTION: +25/-8
Re: 2025 NCAA Proposed Rule Changes
« Reply #10 on: March 06, 2025, 12:46:21 PM »
They've taken a smaller step so they can avoid suspending players for an entire drive. They want to avoid that because, as we know, they're very worried that legitimately injured players would try to stay in the game and risk further injury.

I appreciate this and I also like how this new rule will, at the very least, clean up the appalling optics of a Team B player spontaneously flopping to the ground all by his lonesome in open space as if he just got punched by Ant-Man.

But this rule, like the hypothetical "out for a drive" rule, could also prevent legitimately injured players from receiving the aid they need. I can envision a player trying to limp off the field while his coach holds the medical staff back from assisting him because they need all their timeouts.