« previous next »
Pages: [1]

Author Topic: Rule 9-4-7  (Read 1369 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline BetweenTheLines

  • *
  • Posts: 180
  • FAN REACTION: +12/-3
  • Without officials... it is only recess.
Rule 9-4-7
« on: October 28, 2025, 08:09:44 AM »
Hey Ralph or anyone else who might sit in the NFHS committee. Is there any reason to still have this rule in the book? This contact is covered in 9-4-3m.
Logged

Offline NVFOA_Ump

  • *
  • Posts: 4180
  • FAN REACTION: +107/-341
  • High School (MA & RI)
    • Massachusetts Independent Football Officials Association
Re: Rule 9-4-7
« Reply #1 on: October 28, 2025, 09:48:00 AM »

9-4-7 . . . No defensive player may use the hand(s) to slap the blocker’s head.

9-4-3-m   Target an opponent.

What is the actual question here?  The 2 referenced rules do not cover the same foul?
« Last Edit: October 29, 2025, 06:45:24 AM by NVFOA_Ump »
Logged
It's easy to get the players, getting 'em to play together, that's the hard part. - Casey Stengel

Offline SCHSref

  • *
  • Posts: 451
  • FAN REACTION: +15/-10
  • In the land of the blind, the one eyed man is king
Re: Rule 9-4-7
« Reply #2 on: October 28, 2025, 11:07:54 AM »
Yet, there is a way to make legal contact to the helmet and not be charged with a foul
Logged
If you didn't see it, you can't call it

Offline GoodScout

  • *
  • Posts: 508
  • FAN REACTION: +17/-12
Re: Rule 9-4-7
« Reply #3 on: October 28, 2025, 03:04:49 PM »
Wait five seconds, then kill it.

Or be like Bryan Doyle-Murray at the end of Caddyshack and just poise yourself over the ball, put your hands on your knees, and keep staring at the ball.  ;D
Logged

Online Ralph Damren

  • *
  • Posts: 5047
  • FAN REACTION: +874/-28
  • SEE IT-THINK IT-CALL IT
Re: Rule 9-4-7
« Reply #4 on: October 29, 2025, 06:56:26 AM »
Reference cases 9.4.3V and 9.4.7A-C. While both fall into the PF rule, they can differ. As we Mainers say:

BEST TA' SAY IT TWICE THAN TO NOT SAY IT AT ALL yEs:
« Last Edit: October 29, 2025, 07:12:24 AM by Ralph Damren »
Logged

Offline BetweenTheLines

  • *
  • Posts: 180
  • FAN REACTION: +12/-3
  • Without officials... it is only recess.
Re: Rule 9-4-7
« Reply #5 on: October 29, 2025, 08:07:53 AM »
Let me get my point across with a question. Is a slap to the head an act by a player taking aim and initiating contact against an opponent above the shoulders?
Logged

Offline NVFOA_Ump

  • *
  • Posts: 4180
  • FAN REACTION: +107/-341
  • High School (MA & RI)
    • Massachusetts Independent Football Officials Association
Re: Rule 9-4-7
« Reply #6 on: October 29, 2025, 09:16:05 AM »
Quote from: BetweenTheLines on October 29, 2025, 08:07:53 AM
Let me get my point across with a question. Is a slap to the head an act by a player taking aim and initiating contact against an opponent above the shoulders?


Not really, and not what is intended by the two different rules.
Logged
It's easy to get the players, getting 'em to play together, that's the hard part. - Casey Stengel

Offline Fatso

  • *
  • Posts: 340
  • FAN REACTION: +11/-89
  • Hey ref, call it both ways.......
Re: Rule 9-4-7
« Reply #7 on: October 29, 2025, 01:10:39 PM »
Just curious, what's the reason for having a foul specifically for "Slapping Blocker's Head"  rather than a general foul "slapping another player in the head"?   
Logged

Offline NVFOA_Ump

  • *
  • Posts: 4180
  • FAN REACTION: +107/-341
  • High School (MA & RI)
    • Massachusetts Independent Football Officials Association
Re: Rule 9-4-7
« Reply #8 on: October 29, 2025, 01:20:39 PM »
Quote from: Fatso on October 29, 2025, 01:10:39 PM
Just curious, what's the reason for having a foul specifically for "Slapping Blocker's Head"  rather than a general foul "slapping another player in the head"?


The rule came about when it was being coached as a good way to get a blocking lineman off balance, and it was becoming very common.  Most codes do not want any type of intentional blow to the head or neck area.
Logged
It's easy to get the players, getting 'em to play together, that's the hard part. - Casey Stengel

Offline refjeff

  • *
  • Posts: 606
  • FAN REACTION: +22/-31
  • Without officials... it is only recess.
Re: Rule 9-4-7
« Reply #9 on: October 30, 2025, 06:48:05 PM »
 yEs:
Quote from: BetweenTheLines on October 28, 2025, 08:09:44 AM
Hey Ralph or anyone else who might sit in the NFHS committee. Is there any reason to still have this rule in the book? This contact is covered in 9-4-3m.

It's kind of like your appendix, a vestigial remnant of evolution.
Logged
Pages: [1]
« previous next »