Author Topic: SANTA'S WISH LIST....2026 version  (Read 4808 times)

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Ralph Damren

  • *
  • Posts: 5047
  • FAN REACTION: +874/-28
  • SEE IT-THINK IT-CALL IT
SANTA'S WISH LIST....2026 version
« on: December 25, 2025, 08:55:16 AM »
Would like your opinions on the following.....

(1) R protected on juggled fair catch untile he secures.
(2) Invalid fair catch = no penalty, but no fair catch.
(3) B or R can score on a PAT
(4) Leaping to block kick =  ^flag
(5) No 5-yard facemask foul
(6) Must wear proper equipment during warm-ups
(7) Remove knee pad requirements
(8) head items extending below helmet illegal (ski masks etc.)
(9) can wear sweatbands anywhere
(10) IP with 12 = IS, 5 yards ^flag
(11) Feet-first slide kills play
(12) 2 DB/PFs =  :thumbup
(13) Full yardage on  ^flag all the way down to 1

Would welcome and respect your opinions on these. Often some of your responses I can use to support my opinion. THANKS

 :sTiR: :sTiR: :sTiR: :sTiR: :sTiR: :sTiR: :sTiR: :sTiR: :sTiR: :sTiR: :sTiR: tiphat:

Offline regularjoe

  • *
  • Posts: 9
  • FAN REACTION: +1/-2
  • Without officials... it is only recess.
Re: SANTA'S WISH LIST....2026 version
« Reply #1 on: December 25, 2025, 09:26:52 AM »
I absolutely love 7(knee pads)and 13(full yardage to the 1).

Knee pads don’t exist anymore anyway. They are about the size and effectiveness of a saltine cracker. The barn doors are permanently closed on that one.
And I’m sure there was some logical rationale on the half the distance thing many generations ago but it seems gimmicky to me to penalize a team less than they would be penalized further upfield.

Offline Ralph Damren

  • *
  • Posts: 5047
  • FAN REACTION: +874/-28
  • SEE IT-THINK IT-CALL IT
Re: SANTA'S WISH LIST....2026 version
« Reply #2 on: December 25, 2025, 09:38:26 AM »
Thanks, Joe, for your prompt response.  It seems that failure of higher levels to enforce their knee-pad rule has trickled down to our level in many areas. The full penalty enforcement was the norm until 1959  in NFHS. When we carved auto. 1st down out of DPI, I felt this could open up intentional fouls by B -if beaten - with ball inside their 30 and half the distance. The potential of moving the ball all the way to their one would probably stop that.

Offline bossman72

  • *
  • Posts: 2292
  • FAN REACTION: +310/-29
Re: SANTA'S WISH LIST....2026 version
« Reply #3 on: December 25, 2025, 09:58:31 AM »
(1) R protected on juggled fair catch untile he secures.
No.  I think this adds unnecessary complexity to the rule.  NCAA has this and I don't particularly care for it.

(2) Invalid fair catch = no penalty, but no fair catch.
Yes.  NCAA has this and it's great.  This can lead to getting rid of the "get away" signal by interpretation if that's something NFHS wants to get rid of.

(3) B or R can score on a PAT
No.  This is unnecessarily complex for NFHS.  Check out the penalty enforcement section in NCAA for tries and overtime.  If the NFHS can't write simple Rule 10 stuff for fouls behind the LOS, imagine how royally they'll screw this up.  This would take a minimum 6 years of revisions for the brainiacs on the editorial committee to get it 80% right.

(4) Leaping to block kick =  ^flag
Indifferent.  I'm assuming the foul would be for landing on a K player.  Leaning towards No because the way the rule is written could lead to ticky-tack fouls that shouldn't be fouls.

(5) No 5-yard facemask foul
Yes.  Everything 15.

(6) Must wear proper equipment during warm-ups
No. What's the point?

(7) Remove knee pad requirements
Yes.  NCAA used to have "it's RECOMMENDED that the knee pads cover the knee" in the rulebook which was great.  But, that also leads to players wearing biker shorts.  So you'd have to figure out how to balance the two.

(8) head items extending below helmet illegal (ski masks etc.)
Indifferent.  Probably no as it doesn't seem to be a problem.

(9) can wear sweatbands anywhere
Yes

(10) IP with 12 = IS, 5 yards ^flag
Yes.  The only difference between 5 and 15 is when officials get their count.  Yardage should not be determined by how fast we count.  Players coming off the sideline to participate after the ball is snapped is still 15.  Edited to add: This would not get rid of the dead ball IS foul.  So if you line up with 15 guys on defense, we can still shut it down and penalize 5 yards.

(11) Feet-first slide kills play
Yes, because a sliding QB is already defined as defenseless, so he shouldn't get the extra yardage.

(12) 2 DB/PFs =  :thumbup
No.  Sometimes late hits happen.  Like there's a difference between a late hit out of bounds on the sideline and a slap to the head after the play.  I would support using our judgment to convert dead ball UNRs into UNS though.

(13) Full yardage on  ^flag all the way down to 1
No.  I'm sure there's a reason the old timers put half the distance into the rulebook.  No need to change it.
« Last Edit: December 30, 2025, 05:59:58 AM by bossman72 »

Offline Ralph Damren

  • *
  • Posts: 5047
  • FAN REACTION: +874/-28
  • SEE IT-THINK IT-CALL IT
Re: SANTA'S WISH LIST....2026 version
« Reply #4 on: December 25, 2025, 11:28:29 AM »
Thanks, Bossman, for your thoughtful responses. My only disagreement is #5, removing the 5-yard facemask. While I agree that some flags should be for 15 and not 5, they keep the players from being off the mask. IMHO, football currently gets a black eye for saftey at the HS level and removing this would only add to the concern.

Offline regularjoe

  • *
  • Posts: 9
  • FAN REACTION: +1/-2
  • Without officials... it is only recess.
Re: SANTA'S WISH LIST....2026 version
« Reply #5 on: December 25, 2025, 12:45:22 PM »
Ralph I thought I had this original idea all these years that half the distance was dumb and should go to penalize every yard up to the 1. Didn’t realize it used to be a thing.

Online riffraft

  • *
  • Posts: 332
  • FAN REACTION: +19/-19
Re: SANTA'S WISH LIST....2026 version
« Reply #6 on: December 25, 2025, 01:57:29 PM »
Would like your opinions on the following.....

(1) R protected on juggled fair catch untile he secures.
Don't think it is necessary
(2) Invalid fair catch = no penalty, but no fair catch.
again think it is much ado about nothing
(3) B or R can score on a PAT
No, have enough issues in 5 man with only one man on the line. Also too many old white hats have to run, could have a bunch of heart attacks
(4) Leaping to block kick =  ^flag
dont think it is necessary
(5) No 5-yard facemask foul
might as well get rid of it.  it is never called (at least by our crew)
(6) Must wear proper equipment during warm-ups
as a U it would make my job easier, but in the early season in Phoenix, the kids don't want to be in full uniform and I don't blame them
(7) Remove knee pad requirements
No, in my opinion it is a safety issue and I am strick with it
(8) head items extending below helmet illegal (ski masks etc.)
alway don''t allow bandanas hanging out of the helmet in Arizona
(9) can wear sweatbands anywhere
Yes, please
(10) IP with 12 = IS, 5 yards ^flag
Not sure how I feel. Lean towards no, if they participate in the play not just didn't get off in time.
(11) Feet-first slide kills play
a player goes down it is already dead
(12) 2 DB/PFs =  :thumbup
no we already have the ability to eject a player for playing dirty not just happen to draw two personals
(13) Full yardage on  ^flag all the way down to 1
No

Would welcome and respect your opinions on these. Often some of your responses I can use to support my opinion. THANKS

 :sTiR: :sTiR: :sTiR: :sTiR: :sTiR: :sTiR: :sTiR: :sTiR: :sTiR: :sTiR: :sTiR: tiphat:

Offline GA Umpire

  • Refstripes Hero
  • *****
  • Posts: 384
  • FAN REACTION: +32/-3
Re: SANTA'S WISH LIST....2026 version
« Reply #7 on: December 25, 2025, 05:24:52 PM »
Would like your opinions on the following.....

(1) R protected on juggled fair catch untile he secures.
(2) Invalid fair catch = no penalty, but no fair catch.
(3) B or R can score on a PAT
(4) Leaping to block kick =  ^flag
(5) No 5-yard facemask foul
(6) Must wear proper equipment during warm-ups
(7) Remove knee pad requirements
(8) head items extending below helmet illegal (ski masks etc.)
(9) can wear sweatbands anywhere
(10) IP with 12 = IS, 5 yards ^flag
(11) Feet-first slide kills play
(12) 2 DB/PFs =  :thumbup
(13) Full yardage on  ^flag all the way down to 1

Would welcome and respect your opinions on these. Often some of your responses I can use to support my opinion. THANKS

 :sTiR: :sTiR: :sTiR: :sTiR: :sTiR: :sTiR: :sTiR: :sTiR: :sTiR: :sTiR: :sTiR: tiphat:
1.  OK.  have not seen in my area.
2.  OK.  If play blown dead at that point.
3.  NO!!!
4.  Present rule is adequate.
5.  OK.
6.  Why?   They are warming up, not playing.
7.  May as well.  It is not enforced now.
8.  What would be the reason to prohibit?
9.  OK.
10. Good idea.
11. Present rule is sufficient.
12. No!  Can eject now for "intent to injure" fouls.
13. No.  Sounds like change for change's sake.

Offline ilyazhito

  • *
  • Posts: 465
  • FAN REACTION: +14/-24
  • Without officials... it is only recess.
Re: SANTA'S WISH LIST....2026 version
« Reply #8 on: December 26, 2025, 08:31:49 AM »
Would like your opinions on the following.....

(1) R protected on juggled fair catch untile he secures.
Yes
(2) Invalid fair catch = no penalty, but no fair catch.
Yes
(3) B or R can score on a PAT
Yes. It's a rare event, but it is exciting when it does happen.
(4) Leaping to block kick =  ^flag
The foul should be for leaping and landing on an opponent. If the foul is for that, then yes.
(5) No 5-yard facemask foul
Yes.
(6) Must wear proper equipment during warm-ups
Yes. Officials may not have a chance to inspect equipment during warmups, or time to correct if players disappear and re-appear in their actual game equipment just before kickoff. Appearing in game equipment at warm-ups gives officials the chance to see equipment problems that could be corrected before game time.
(7) Remove knee pad requirements
Yes. If this isn't going to be enforced, why keep dead letter rules in the game?
(8) head items extending below helmet illegal (ski masks etc.)
No. What is the purpose of this change?
(9) can wear sweatbands anywhere
Yes. I don't see a safety issue with this'
(10) IP with 12 = IS, 5 yards ^flag
Yes. This is usually a substitution error and so should be treated as illegal substitution.
(11) Feet-first slide kills play
Yes. A sliding player is defenseless by rule.
(12) 2 DB/PFs =  :thumbup
Yes. This can discourage knucklehead behavior by players after the play is over.
(13) Full yardage on  ^flag all the way down to 1
Yes. If NFHS will not restore automatic 1st down on DPI, this is the next best option.
Would welcome and respect your opinions on these. Often some of your responses I can use to support my opinion. THANKS

 :sTiR: :sTiR: :sTiR: :sTiR: :sTiR: :sTiR: :sTiR: :sTiR: :sTiR: :sTiR: :sTiR: tiphat:

Offline lawdog

  • *
  • Posts: 269
  • FAN REACTION: +10/-35
Re: SANTA'S WISH LIST....2026 version
« Reply #9 on: December 26, 2025, 10:49:04 AM »
(1) R protected on juggled fair catch until he secures.
Nope.  Hard to judge and rewards bad play.

(2) Invalid fair catch = no penalty, but no fair catch.
don't really see the need.  but don't care.

(3) B or R can score on a PAT
No.  K.I.S.S.  Why we need this anyway?

(4) Leaping to block kick =  ^flag
No.  We already have using another player for leverage.  That's enough.

(5) No 5-yard facemask foul
No.  Feel a lot will not get called and the message is its OK to be on the mask.  Bad idea.

(6) Must wear proper equipment during warm-ups
Penalties happen during games, not before. 

(7) Remove knee pad requirements
NO.  NFHS will not do this after they did a study showing safer with pads.  These bike shorts NCAA allows are a travesty to the game. 

(8) head items extending below helmet illegal (ski masks etc.)
Indifferent.  Probably no as it doesn't seem to be a problem.

(9) can wear sweatbands anywhere
Yes, but not those rubber bands which have no purpose.

(10) IP with 12 = IS, 5 yards ^flag
I'm fine with this.  If we see 12 and stop it like we should it would be 5 anyway.  BUT we don't want to encourage playing with 12 and only getting the same penalty as a substitution either.  But doubt many would do that.

(11) Feet-first slide kills play
NO need.  Unlike NFL, you are down as soon as anything touches anyway.  Just mark it properly.

(12) 2 DB/PFs =  :thumbup
No.  eject if flagrant.  If you want an automatic is has to be higher than 2, I'd say 4

(13) Full yardage on  ^flag all the way down to 1
There are some inequities this would fix.  Ex 1st and goal @ 1 A false starts.  Now 1st and goal @ 6 and B roughs the passer.  Then 1st and goal at 3?  DUMB.  the false start was more costly than the PF. So for that reason I can see some benefit.
« Last Edit: December 26, 2025, 10:56:46 AM by lawdog »

Offline SCline

  • *
  • Posts: 139
  • FAN REACTION: +8/-1
Re: SANTA'S WISH LIST....2026 version
« Reply #10 on: December 26, 2025, 12:35:19 PM »
Would like your opinions on the following.....

(1) R protected on juggled fair catch untile he secures.
No, don’t reward muffing the kick
(2) Invalid fair catch = no penalty, but no fair catch.
No, five yards seems like an appropriate penalty for this
(3) B or R can score on a PAT
No, stretches a 5 man crew way too far, the game issues it causes isn’t worth it
(4) Leaping to block kick =  ^flag
Sure, don’t see this already
(5) No 5-yard facemask foul
No, give us the options
(6) Must wear proper equipment during warm-ups
No, I hope this isn’t seriously considered
(7) Remove knee pad requirements
Ill enforce whatever my betters tell me to enforce
(8) head items extending below helmet illegal (ski masks etc.)
Never see it so don’t care
(9) can wear sweatbands anywhere
No, it’s called a uniform for a reason, let’s keep it looking decent
(10) IP with 12 = IS, 5 yards ^flag
Sure, as others have said our ability to count and flag presnap shouldn’t affect the yardage of the penalty
(11) Feet-first slide kills play
No, all I see this doing is leading to an increase in shouts for DBPF Late Hits
(12) 2 DB/PFs =  :thumbup
No, I would like the ability to upgrade a DBPF only to a UNS to count for ejection
(13) Full yardage on  ^flag all the way down to 1
I like it, removes most of the inequity from the half the distance rule. Thinking about the half the distance rule it really doesn’t seem like the best option out of the various options that we could use as a rule.

Would welcome and respect your opinions on these. Often some of your responses I can use to support my opinion.
« Last Edit: December 26, 2025, 12:37:52 PM by SCline »

Offline ncwingman

  • *
  • Posts: 1443
  • FAN REACTION: +78/-21
  • Without officials... it is only recess.
Re: SANTA'S WISH LIST....2026 version
« Reply #11 on: December 26, 2025, 01:17:08 PM »
(1) Only while the ball remains within the frame of his body, or some similar wordage - if the ball clearly bounces off R and R has to move to catch it, fair game. I do not want to institute some sort of halo rule.
(2) Sure. I'm not sure I've ever seen an invalid (or illegal) fair catch ever penalized before. The only time I've seen it was in a middle school game that we used as a teaching moment.
(3) I've vote no because high school kicking is already sketchy, and I think this would encourage more teams to never kick. However, I wouldn't be too upset if it changes.
(4) Yes. Jumping over the line is dangerous, even if you *technically* jumped over the A-gap and not a player.
(5) Yes
(6) Absolutely no. There's no way this would be enforced, or enforced consistently.
(7) If it's not being enforced anyway, why not?
(8) No, as long as it's not a potential choking hazard
(9) Sure... willing to hear arguments to keep it as it though.
(10) How about if the offended team has the option of enforcing a live ball IP foul, 5 yards from succeeding spot.
(11) At the start of the slide, he's giving himself up, sure.
(12) No. Two late hits shouldn't be an automatic ejection, but I would support ejection for repeated personal fouls at the officials discretion even if none are individually flagrant.
(13) No. That's a weird suggestion, and fixing a problem that doesn't exist.

Offline zebrastripes

  • *
  • Posts: 265
  • FAN REACTION: +23/-90
  • Without officials... it is only recess.
Re: SANTA'S WISH LIST....2026 version
« Reply #12 on: December 27, 2025, 05:10:08 AM »
(1) Yes
(2) Yes, the lack of protection on an invalid FC signal is enough of a penalty, we don’t need the five yards.
(3) God no. I’m generally in favor of most NCAA rules but this is one that is unnecessary in HS. Too many complicated penalty enforcements, not to mention having to run 90+ yards the other way only to come back for the kickoff.
(4) Yes, NFHS just needs to copy and paste the NCAA leaping/leverage rule.
(5) Yes freaking please. The 5-yard foul is antiquated and gives officials a cop out to enforce a less severe penalty even when it should be a PF. If it’s incidental contact without grasping then it just shouldn’t be a foul, plain and simple.
(6) Heck no, we really want to add more uniform rules that won’t get enforced?
(7) Yes, no one wants to wear them properly and officials don’t want to enforce it. I’m not a safetyism kind of official and multiple ATs have told me that knee pads don’t provide the protection that we perceive them to.
(8) No, we do not need or want more fashion police rules.
(9) Yes for the same reason just mentioned.
(10) Yes, and while you’re at it just get rid of IP altogether. All of the IP scenarios can easily be reclassified to IS, illegal touching, or UNS.
(11) Yes, if he’s going to get defenseless player protection then he shouldn’t get the yards after his backside goes down. This is just common sense.
(12) No, instead just allow dead ball contact well after the play to be UNS so we can put a counter on those actions.
(13) Only on DPI (which should also be an AFD) in the end zone.

Offline GoodScout

  • *
  • Posts: 508
  • FAN REACTION: +17/-12
Re: SANTA'S WISH LIST....2026 version
« Reply #13 on: December 27, 2025, 07:18:06 AM »
(1) R protected on juggled fair catch until he secures.
No.  I think this will create countless judgment calls as to whether the player was juggling the ball or in the act of securing it, and may create more injuries rather than reducing them.

(2) Invalid fair catch = no penalty, but no fair catch.
No. Same. Creates more opportunities for players to "light up" the receiver and claim they thought the signal was invalid.

(3) B or R can score on a PAT
No.  Absolutely agree that this will create editorial nightmare that will take a decade to sort out. There's no need for it. All our players know they can't return a PAT - and my routine is to announce "This is the untimed try for point - only the offense can score on this play" which makes it clear.

(4) Leaping to block kick =  ^flag
I'm seeing more of this, so I'm not opposed but if the committee can't recommend a clear, well-defined rule that's easy to administer, vote no. 

(5) No 5-yard facemask foul
No.  Occasionally there's a clear quick-grab of a facemask that everyone sees (and coaches scream for) that you need to put a 5-yard flag down for. It's rare, but still needed.

(6) Must wear proper equipment during warm-ups
I get what you're going for - allowing umpires to correct equipment problems in pregame rather than on the field - but this just won't work in real life.

(7) Remove knee pad requirements
I hate letting the NCAA-parroting high school players win on this, but like most, I've given up the fight. Will be interesting to see if injuries related to knees and players getting hit by knees increases over the next 5 years.

(8) Head items extending below helmet illegal (ski masks etc.)
This is really a rule change in search of a problem. We have no issues with that in our state. (And it's so frikking cold you think we'd see a lot of it!)

(9) Can wear sweatbands anywhere
Indifferenct. I've never heard of a player being injured by a sweatband, so as long as there's no hard surfaces, hey, sure.

(10) IP with 12 = IS, 5 yards ^flag
No.  While the yardage may be determined by how fast we count, the penalty isn't.  It's determined by whether a team puts 12 players on the field or not. If teams run hurry-up and can't count to 12, then sorry coach, you get to count to 15.

(11) Feet-first slide kills play
There's no need for this to be in the rules. As soon as the runner's leg above the ankle hit the ground, the play is dead and that's the spot - where he was holding the ball.

(12) 2 DB/PFs = 
No.  Agree sometimes things happen. If a player continues to be a problem, the flagrant foul designation allows for ejection. And I don't want to go down the NFL route of mixing up UNRs & UNS's.

(13) Full yardage on  a flag all the way down to 1
No. No need to change it.

In fact, I want the committee to NOT change ANY rule unless there's been numerous incidents and there's a demonstrated need to protect player safety or there's clear inequity. Otherwise, the default setting should be: No Rule Change.

Online riffraft

  • *
  • Posts: 332
  • FAN REACTION: +19/-19
Re: SANTA'S WISH LIST....2026 version
« Reply #14 on: December 27, 2025, 09:39:48 AM »
I am surprised at the number who say that they don't enforce the knee pad rule.

Offline NVFOA_Ump

  • *
  • Posts: 4180
  • FAN REACTION: +107/-341
  • High School (MA & RI)
    • Massachusetts Independent Football Officials Association
Re: SANTA'S WISH LIST....2026 version
« Reply #15 on: December 27, 2025, 10:55:14 AM »
(1) R protected on juggled fair catch until he secures. Yes, protected until ball hits ground
(2) Invalid fair catch = no penalty, but no fair catch. Yes, and ball is dead
(3) B or R can score on a PAT.   No
(4) Leaping to block kick. As long as don't land on anyone
(5) No 5-yard facemask foul. Yes
(6) Must wear proper equipment during warm-ups.  No
(7) Remove knee pad requirements. No, leave as local decision
(8) head items extending below helmet illegal (ski masks etc.). Yes
(9) can wear sweatbands anywhere.  Yes
(10) IP with 12 = IS, 5 yards.  No
(11) Feet-first slide kills play.  Yes
(12) 2 DB/PFs. = ejection.  No, if judged flagrant per 9-4 we can eject
(13) Full yardage on penalty enforcement all the way down to 1.  Only on DPI
« Last Edit: December 30, 2025, 09:22:30 AM by NVFOA_Ump »
It's easy to get the players, getting 'em to play together, that's the hard part. - Casey Stengel

Offline zebrastripes

  • *
  • Posts: 265
  • FAN REACTION: +23/-90
  • Without officials... it is only recess.
Re: SANTA'S WISH LIST....2026 version
« Reply #16 on: December 27, 2025, 11:04:34 AM »
I am surprised at the number who say that they don't enforce the knee pad rule.
I’m not. Even if correct to enforce it, unless you have the full backing of your state and/or assigner, it’s a losing battle. Whether fair or not assigners don’t want their phones blowing up with complaints about guys enforcing what is perceived to be a “nitpicky” rule.

Offline GoodScout

  • *
  • Posts: 508
  • FAN REACTION: +17/-12
Re: SANTA'S WISH LIST....2026 version
« Reply #17 on: December 27, 2025, 04:37:38 PM »
I am surprised at the number who say that they don't enforce the knee pad rule.
Unfortunately, many of us were told by our assignors not to deal with it this year - and we weren't happy about it.

Offline bossman72

  • *
  • Posts: 2292
  • FAN REACTION: +310/-29
Re: SANTA'S WISH LIST....2026 version
« Reply #18 on: December 27, 2025, 09:08:25 PM »
Thanks, Bossman, for your thoughtful responses. My only disagreement is #5, removing the 5-yard facemask. While I agree that some flags should be for 15 and not 5, they keep the players from being off the mask. IMHO, football currently gets a black eye for saftey at the HS level and removing this would only add to the concern.

To me, the 5 yarder is not worth calling.  It's literally just placing your hand on the mask without any twist/turn.  The offense should not get 5 more yards and a replay of the down for that, or have that offset another foul.

Any twist/turn should be 15.

Offline zebrastripes

  • *
  • Posts: 265
  • FAN REACTION: +23/-90
  • Without officials... it is only recess.
Re: SANTA'S WISH LIST....2026 version
« Reply #19 on: December 27, 2025, 09:24:28 PM »
To me, the 5 yarder is not worth calling.  It's literally just placing your hand on the mask without any twist/turn.  The offense should not get 5 more yards and a replay of the down for that, or have that offset another foul.

Any twist/turn should be 15.
Totally agree. And the fact that we have the 5-yard option in high school more often than not just allows a cop out to enforce a less severe penalty. The overwhelming majority of 5-yard fouls I see called really should be personal fouls, and the ones that shouldn’t be are so minor that they shouldn’t be a foul period. It’s an antiquated rule that isn’t kept alive by anything more than safetyism.

Offline Ralph Damren

  • *
  • Posts: 5047
  • FAN REACTION: +874/-28
  • SEE IT-THINK IT-CALL IT
Re: SANTA'S WISH LIST....2026 version
« Reply #20 on: December 29, 2025, 09:16:16 AM »
 The 5-yard facemask removal has been on the docket before, but I don't believe ever gained much support. While I agree that probably many of the
IFM (incidental facemask) calls could be PFFMs, when we added it back in 2000 one of it's intent was to keep players' hands away from opponents facemasks. IMHO, removing IFM from the NFHS code would send a poor message to the public that are already told of the dangers of football.

After it's passage in 2000, I was asked by coaches and officials to explain the judgement...I developed the following fable (caution PG-13) :

Pretend that you were unknowingly dating an hermaphrodite; 8]
On your 3rd date- you were a gentleman- you slip your hand under their skirt;  >:D
        You put your hand around an appendage you didn't expect ; :o
AND YOU QUICKLY PULL YOUR HAND AWAY :!# .

IMHO, removing IFM in this era of "safety first" would not help our goal.

CHARLES O'FINLEY'S STANCE : "If two men agreed on everything, only one would be needed."

Offline Ralph Damren

  • *
  • Posts: 5047
  • FAN REACTION: +874/-28
  • SEE IT-THINK IT-CALL IT
Re: SANTA'S WISH LIST....2026 version
« Reply #21 on: December 29, 2025, 01:49:56 PM »
Our NFHS Rules Committee meeting is January 12-14 and I'll be bringing your responses with me. Thank all of you for your replies as I will use some of your opinions to bolster mine's it our debates.

KEEP THOSE POSTS COMING  tiphat:

Offline RMR

  • *
  • Posts: 518
  • FAN REACTION: +10/-6
Re: SANTA'S WISH LIST....2026 version
« Reply #22 on: December 29, 2025, 09:12:18 PM »
Thanks, Joe, for your prompt response.  It seems that failure of higher levels to enforce their knee-pad rule has trickled down to our level in many areas. The full penalty enforcement was the norm until 1959  in NFHS. When we carved auto. 1st down out of DPI, I felt this could open up intentional fouls by B -if beaten - with ball inside their 30 and half the distance. The potential of moving the ball all the way to their one would probably stop that.

How long ago did the AFD go away on DPI? What's it been, 7-8 years now? Week one this season A had a fourth and goal at B's 8. Pass to the end zone with DPI. Now it's fourth and goal at the 4 and I see A's coach giving it to my L pretty good and I had a pretty good idea what it was about. Then he called timeout and wanted an explanation from me why he wasn't playing first and goal. So I explained to him that it's no longer and AFD. "He pointed at my L and said, "That's what he said, when the hell did they change that?" "

"I don't know, at least five years ago."

"First I'm hearing of it, you sure that's right?"

"Ummm, yes."
"Just because you don't understand it, doesn't mean it's wrong."

Offline RMR

  • *
  • Posts: 518
  • FAN REACTION: +10/-6
Re: SANTA'S WISH LIST....2026 version
« Reply #23 on: December 29, 2025, 09:19:53 PM »
(1) R protected on juggled fair catch until he secures.
No. 

(2) Invalid fair catch = no penalty, but no fair catch.
Yes. 

(3) B or R can score on a PAT
No.  It works fine like it is now.

(4) Leaping to block kick =  ^flag
Not a fan.

(5) No 5-yard facemask foul
Yes.

(6) Must wear proper equipment during warm-ups
No. Overly officious.

(7) Remove knee pad requirements
Yes.  We get zero support to enforce it so why keep up the charade?

(8) head items extending below helmet illegal (ski masks etc.)
Don't care.

(9) can wear sweatbands anywhere
Yes and as long as we're at it can we allow them to wear their play cards on their belts?

(10) IP with 12 = IS, 5 yards ^flag
Yes. 

(11) Feet-first slide kills play
Yes, this has been how we have been told to interpret it anyhow.

(12) 2 DB/PFs =  :thumbup
No.  I would be OK with a rule like the NCAA allowing us to penalize as a UNS in certain circumstances

(13) Full yardage on  ^flag all the way down to 1
No.  Just give us back the automatic first down
« Last Edit: December 29, 2025, 09:22:57 PM by RMR »
"Just because you don't understand it, doesn't mean it's wrong."

Offline bama_stripes

  • *
  • Posts: 3153
  • FAN REACTION: +124/-29
Re: SANTA'S WISH LIST....2026 version
« Reply #24 on: December 30, 2025, 07:57:26 AM »
I’m opposed to #s 3, 6, 10 & 12.  I’d be OK with #13 for DPI only, although I’d rather reinstate AFD.
Like others, my wish list includes another rewrite of 10-4.

And while we’re at it, how about letting a few of the members of RefStripes vet the language of all rules and editorial changes? :!#