Author Topic: Interesting Crackback Block  (Read 29940 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Diablo

  • Guest
Interesting Crackback Block
« on: November 01, 2010, 11:38:43 AM »
Check out the last video on Rom Gilbert's Week 10 Clips.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a9ZNOoO-F98

Whats y'all think and why?

Offline TXMike

  • *
  • Posts: 8773
  • FAN REACTION: +229/-269
  • When you quit learning you quit living
Re: Interesting Crackback Block
« Reply #1 on: November 01, 2010, 11:40:07 AM »
[yt=425,350]a9ZNOoO-F98[/yt]

The L had that guy and the wideout so perhaps it would have been helpful for the U to check with the L to verify the guy he flagged was indeed restricted.
« Last Edit: November 01, 2010, 11:45:03 AM by TXMike »

Offline jrfath

  • *
  • Posts: 165
  • FAN REACTION: +7/-4
Re: Interesting Crackback Block
« Reply #2 on: November 01, 2010, 11:51:08 AM »
A couple issues here...

The R and U can help (pre-snap) on the backs lining up, and if they are inside or outside of the tackle's frame.  He looks to be inside the frame of the RT.

Also, the R gave the clipping signal, not the block below the waist signal.
No-calls are soon forgotten...blown calls live forever.

Offline Kalle

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 3418
  • FAN REACTION: +114/-35
Re: Interesting Crackback Block
« Reply #3 on: November 01, 2010, 12:51:54 PM »
I think this emphasizes the need to know the number of your key all the way until the ball is spotted for the next down and the need for crew communication. It is L's key so he should know that the player was a RB, and either R or U (maybe B) should have then realized that he wasn't restricted from blocking below the waist.

Learning points for me: if an action I flag is foul only sometimes, I should let the R know all relevant data, including player position at the snap, if I happen to know it. Also, as a 5-man crew R, I need to start taking note of the position of the runningbacks.


Online Etref

  • Administrator
  • ***
  • Posts: 2371
  • FAN REACTION: +87/-29
  • " I don't make the rules coach!"
Re: Interesting Crackback Block
« Reply #4 on: November 01, 2010, 02:02:34 PM »
I think this emphasizes the need to know the number of your key all the way until the ball is spotted for the next down and the need for crew communication. It is L's key so he should know that the player was a RB, and either R or U (maybe B) should have then realized that he wasn't restricted from blocking below the waist.

Learning points for me: if an action I flag is foul only sometimes, I should let the R know all relevant data, including player position at the snap, if I happen to know it. Also, as a 5-man crew R, I need to start taking note of the position of the runningbacks.



Hard to keep track of the backs with all of the  shifts, motion, no huddle, etc.


" I don't make the rules coach!"

Offline jrfath

  • *
  • Posts: 165
  • FAN REACTION: +7/-4
Re: Interesting Crackback Block
« Reply #5 on: November 01, 2010, 02:22:48 PM »
Even though it is the wing's key, the R and U can help here.

We use a mechanic where the R and U give a punch forward (inside frame) or out (outside frame) to help the wing determine if that back is inside or outside of the tackle's frame.
No-calls are soon forgotten...blown calls live forever.

Offline NVFOA_Ump

  • *
  • Posts: 4180
  • FAN REACTION: +107/-340
  • High School (MA & RI)
    • Massachusetts Independent Football Officials Association
Re: Interesting Crackback Block
« Reply #6 on: November 01, 2010, 03:36:35 PM »
Whats y'all think and why?

Had two calls similar to this in a game (5-man crew MA high school) where team A was using 3 backs (all numbered in the 20's) where they would be shifting to wings, going in motion, etc... .  Twice we had low blocks with a #2n back clearly coming back from outside and downfield then blocking low.

We discussed at length after the game, and further in our next weekly board meeting, but there's no question that with a "shifting / motion" offense in a 5-man game keeping track of which one(s) of the three backs are stationary in the tackle box at the snap and are therefore "legal" for this type of block needs some attention and focus pre-snap.

Any suggestions on mechanics and keys to help with this in a 5-man game?
It's easy to get the players, getting 'em to play together, that's the hard part. - Casey Stengel

yteside

  • Guest
Re: Interesting Crackback Block
« Reply #7 on: November 01, 2010, 04:17:04 PM »
I, personally, see this as to why you do not flag in 'other people's' ponds.  This would be the L's call; this block(low, back toward position of ball) is never a block a U keys on.  This is no different if the F sees a hold by the LG...he cannot help the situation. 
If the call is missed, let it be missed; trying to 'save' a crewmate can sometimes only make things worse.  Just be careful.

The Ref Thats Lef

  • Guest
Re: Interesting Crackback Block
« Reply #8 on: November 01, 2010, 04:37:03 PM »
Whilst I might be doing the coaches a disservice it is interesting that the coaches just accept the call. If they thought it was wrong they would usually be telling the officials all about it. The fact they did not suggests to me that they don't really know that rule too well.

Offline TXMike

  • *
  • Posts: 8773
  • FAN REACTION: +229/-269
  • When you quit learning you quit living
Re: Interesting Crackback Block
« Reply #9 on: November 01, 2010, 04:59:04 PM »
Hard to keep track of the backs with all of the  shifts, motion, no huddle, etc.

Stay tuned.  I have a clip from another game this weekend where a motion back ends up getting way outside as the play develops and then throws a "crackback"  (unflagged).  Will be good to hear takes on who should see it and who would even recognize the offfender was restricted at the snap.

Diablo

  • Guest
Re: Interesting Crackback Block
« Reply #10 on: November 01, 2010, 05:32:43 PM »

Any suggestions on mechanics and keys to help with this in a 5-man game?


Try this recommendation. 
1.  All officials should say their key's number prior to the snap.  Ditto for the defender marking receivers.  Hint:  Practice this when you attend a live game.
2.  Know where your key is at the snap and if in motion.  S, B, & F can usually tell if their keys are inside the tackle or not. 
3.  R & U should know whether set backs are inside/outside the tackle prior to the snap. 
4.  At the end of the play, if an official reports an illegal crackback foul, the R should be programed to ask where the offending player was at the snap.  If the calling official doesn't know, go around the horn to determine which official was keying the perp.  The R & U can step forward with the location of H & L keys inside. 

Offline Ump62

  • *
  • Posts: 131
  • FAN REACTION: +3/-0
Re: Interesting Crackback Block
« Reply #11 on: November 01, 2010, 06:22:41 PM »
I, personally, see this as to why you do not flag in 'other people's' ponds.  This would be the L's call; this block(low, back toward position of ball) is never a block a U keys on.  This is no different if the F sees a hold by the LG...he cannot help the situation. 
If the call is missed, let it be missed; trying to 'save' a crewmate can sometimes only make things worse.  Just be careful.

I think the U's flag is for the holding, not the Crack Back.
Now the question is about the Hold. The U dropped his flag long after the play at the 30. What appears to be a hold by
#66 looks to be at the 40. Why so late and why 10 yards away from the Hold?

Offline TXMike

  • *
  • Posts: 8773
  • FAN REACTION: +229/-269
  • When you quit learning you quit living
Re: Interesting Crackback Block
« Reply #12 on: November 01, 2010, 09:52:07 PM »
I think the U's flag is for the holding, not the Crack Back.
Now the question is about the Hold. The U dropped his flag long after the play at the 30. What appears to be a hold by
#66 looks to be at the 40. Why so late and why 10 yards away from the Hold?

Ibelieve the reason it is at the 30 is the U who flagged the BBW.  Nobody else is talking to the R so how we would know about the BBW?

Offline TXMike

  • *
  • Posts: 8773
  • FAN REACTION: +229/-269
  • When you quit learning you quit living
Re: Interesting Crackback Block
« Reply #13 on: November 01, 2010, 09:53:13 PM »
...and speaking of the difficulty tracking a motion back as he moves into the action and then potentially commits a BBW foul...take a look:

[yt=425,350]aY6XJA6PoyM[/yt]

Offline blindref757

  • *
  • Posts: 562
  • FAN REACTION: +30/-17
Re: Interesting Crackback Block
« Reply #14 on: November 01, 2010, 10:01:25 PM »
Wow...he whiffs on the initial block and B runs into him.  I don't see this as a BBW...maybe a train wreck...but not BBW.  If there was intent, yes...it's a BBW...and I have no idea who should get it.  Very tough call.

Offline Welpe

  • *
  • Posts: 1860
  • FAN REACTION: +28/-11
Re: Interesting Crackback Block
« Reply #15 on: November 01, 2010, 11:04:34 PM »
The OP is a great example of why the blocking below the waist rules need to be simplified.

Offline JugglingReferee

  • *
  • Posts: 1059
  • FAN REACTION: +40/-15
  • Ἰησοῦς Χριστός, Θεοῦ Υἱός, Σωτήρ
Re: Interesting Crackback Block
« Reply #16 on: November 02, 2010, 02:17:38 AM »
If you're near the border, just work a season or two in Canada, and you'll be an expert on officiating in-motion players.   

Diablo's points above are spot-on.  And the ability to remember a number or two.  Pre-snap, you have to identify your eligibles, your primary and secondary receiver, and guys eligible to do things like BBW or those restricted from the crackback.

Offline TXMike

  • *
  • Posts: 8773
  • FAN REACTION: +229/-269
  • When you quit learning you quit living
Re: Interesting Crackback Block
« Reply #17 on: November 02, 2010, 05:10:17 AM »
Wow...he whiffs on the initial block and B runs into him.  I don't see this as a BBW...maybe a train wreck...but not BBW.  If there was intent, yes...it's a BBW...and I have no idea who should get it.  Very tough call.
Uhhhhhh....didn't you say this?

"...this BLOCK looks just as unsafe as a run of the mill BBW even though it might not meet the exact definition."     >:D

Offline Kalle

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 3418
  • FAN REACTION: +114/-35
Re: Interesting Crackback Block
« Reply #18 on: November 02, 2010, 05:20:04 AM »
Any suggestions on mechanics and keys to help with this in a 5-man game?

Diablo's suggestions are spot-on but relate to a 7-man crew. In a 5-man crew I think it becomes the responsibility of the referee to know which receivers are allowed to crack, as the wings and B will have their heads full figuring out the keys and their numbers.

Offline NVFOA_Ump

  • *
  • Posts: 4180
  • FAN REACTION: +107/-340
  • High School (MA & RI)
    • Massachusetts Independent Football Officials Association
Re: Interesting Crackback Block
« Reply #19 on: November 02, 2010, 06:07:43 AM »
I believe that Diablo's suggestions as applied to a five man crew are the only reasonable way to handle this.  The R & the U need to identify those backs pre-snap that are going to be OK for BBW coming back toward the ball.  Given the keys for the wing officials, especially in obvious pass situations when the outside receivers are long gone and a play is breaking down into a fire drill, the R & U are going to end up owning this call.
It's easy to get the players, getting 'em to play together, that's the hard part. - Casey Stengel

Offline James

  • *
  • Posts: 692
  • FAN REACTION: +7/-6
Re: Interesting Crackback Block
« Reply #20 on: November 02, 2010, 06:10:51 AM »
I, personally, see this as to why you do not flag in 'other people's' ponds.  This would be the L's call; this block(low, back toward position of ball) is never a block a U keys on.  This is no different if the F sees a hold by the LG...he cannot help the situation. 
If the call is missed, let it be missed; trying to 'save' a crewmate can sometimes only make things worse.  Just be careful.

With the wings having the ball carrier and the R cleaning up behind the play, is it not the responsibility of the U to watch the POA and action in front? Or does the U have action behind and the BJ watches in front?

Offline fencewire

  • *
  • Posts: 439
  • FAN REACTION: +20/-74
Re: Interesting Crackback Block
« Reply #21 on: November 02, 2010, 08:29:32 AM »
if we judge the "intent" of the rule, wouldn't the original play qualify, I know by rule that is not a foul, but that guy has moved himself outside the normal tackle then blocked back towards the ball, no different than a slot receiver.  That is one of the problem with the rules with blocks below the waist.

Offline Birddog

  • *
  • Posts: 211
  • FAN REACTION: +2/-2
Re: Interesting Crackback Block
« Reply #22 on: November 02, 2010, 09:51:47 AM »
Mike I saw that play from the USC game also.  Glad you posted it.

HS game here in Texas.  Wing-back from other side of formation in motion toward me, I am HL.  Back goes wide then heads upfield then cuts the safety back toward the middle of the field. I flag it and coach is beside himself.

Coach said this to me:
He can do that because he started on other side???
He can do that because he came to this side then went downfield???
Georgia Tech and Navy do it all the time???

I tried my best to tell him no player in motion can block back toward the orginal positon of the ball.  I think he thought since the back was in motion toward the near sideline at the snap he was exempt.

Then later in the game after things have settled down he said his player was blocking low but straight downfield.  He had changed his whole line of argument.   

KB

  • Guest
Re: Interesting Crackback Block
« Reply #23 on: November 04, 2010, 03:41:54 AM »
No player, no matter where he originally lined up, should be allowed to block towards the middle of the field in a sidezone.
I don't see a difference safetywise between a WR or a pulling OG taking out a LB's knee.

MJT

  • Guest
Re: Interesting Crackback Block
« Reply #24 on: November 08, 2010, 12:11:23 AM »
I saw the original play live and had it on DVR. The problem was a lack of communication by the crew. This is a safety call, which "IF" the block was illegal because of the location of the back (which it was not illegal as he was inside the tackle) would be a call that needs to be flagged by someone. It was a good pick up by the U, but then the flag should have been picked up when the R, U, and H got together and discussed where this player was at the start of the play. The U just saw a not-linemen coming back towards the ball inside the 10 yard belt and blocking below the waist. He is thinking this is a foul, but should have found out where he came from. This is the H's key and he could have got involved and subsequently the flag picked up, which it should have.

BTW, on our crew, the R or U will point if they have a back who is outside the tackle box, indicating to the short wings and B that he is restricted from blocking below the waist back towards the ball.