Mike, I hate to tell you, but it isn't just people that are looking for a way to jump on a game -- any game. Many I know, including 25, 30 year veterans with solid regular season schedules and 4A/5A state championships under their belt had the view of, "I'm here to work football; if I need to sign up with UIL, so be it." We can't pretend that the only ones who would have worked were those with sour attitudes who weren't working the schedules they thought they deserved.
TASO football doesn't have the solidarity (and I hate that term because I'm about as anti-union as it gets) that is needed and nowhere near what baseball seems to have. Whether it was opportunists or people who just didn't think TASO was worth sitting out games for, there was no way a lockout or boycott would have happened or been effective. Maybe locally or regionally, but not all over the state. In my view, there are too many "fat and happy" football officials around Texas -- those who think that their 20 regular season and 8 5A playoff games (making $150 a game minimum) are sufficient for them and everyone else is on their own. Who cares if baseball or basketball has to settle for $45 for a varsity game. If you don't think this attitude is present in certain areas, you're kidding yourself.
If you want to do hindsight, you have to go back 5 years or more. Get rid of the then ED, which is what basketball wanted. Basketball threatened to leave, UIL with football's help, pulled the rug out from under them -- then after regime change at UIL, they saw a money making and power grab opportunity. So football didn't support either basketball OR baseball in either's tassel with TASO and UIL. Worse, football allowed itself to be used by UIL.
Basketball is now finding out that the grass wasn't greener on UIL's side. But for a lot of reasons, they will still give TASO the finger -- and frankly, given the way some of their directors were treated by TASO, I can't blame them.
Sorry, but you asked.