Author Topic: Interesting Take On What We Do  (Read 5999 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline bama_stripes

  • *
  • Posts: 3159
  • FAN REACTION: +124/-29
Interesting Take On What We Do
« on: October 07, 2011, 07:36:11 AM »

Offline clearwall

  • *
  • Posts: 758
  • FAN REACTION: +14/-13
Re: Interesting Take On What We Do
« Reply #1 on: October 07, 2011, 08:02:51 AM »
Any insight on what the rule was?

Offline AlUpstateNY

  • *
  • Posts: 4843
  • FAN REACTION: +344/-1000
Re: Interesting Take On What We Do
« Reply #2 on: October 07, 2011, 09:08:30 AM »
Nice article.  Just an opinion, but I believe the NFHS rejects the concept of "instant replay" because they realize, despite all the fanfare and spectacle, HS Football although a terrific and exciting game, is a game played by HS student-athletes and not a matter of world peace or US Supreme Court attention.

Even the very best coaches make errors in play selection, personnel assignments and general judgment.  Even the best, most serious and attentive players fail to execute their assignments in critical assignments and officials sometimes fail to see everything they're expected to.  Part of this great game is guaging how a team responds to adversity, how it deals with errors by coaches, players or officials whose judgment, about the relative impact of some technical violation is, or is not, material to the conduct of the game.

John Madden is rumored to have opined, "a major difference between officials and coaches is that officials are not graded on who wins or loses", which is a significant, and important, distinction.

Perhaps the NFHS realizes that regardless of how significant any High School Football game might seem, it's likely a minimum of 500 Million Chinese, really couldn't care less.

mbyron

  • Guest
Re: Interesting Take On What We Do
« Reply #3 on: October 07, 2011, 10:54:53 AM »
Nice article.  Just an opinion, but I believe the NFHS rejects the concept of "instant replay" because they realize, despite all the fanfare and spectacle, HS Football although a terrific and exciting game, is a game played by HS student-athletes and not a matter of world peace or US Supreme Court attention.
They don't allow replay in football because there's such disparity between facilities. Some have 7+ digital HD cameras and replay booths already, and some have a dad in the pressbox with a 15 year old analog camcorder.

Offline TXMike

  • *
  • Posts: 8773
  • FAN REACTION: +229/-269
  • When you quit learning you quit living
Re: Interesting Take On What We Do
« Reply #4 on: October 07, 2011, 03:46:21 PM »
Stay tuned...I know a state which shall remain nameless where the state HS extracurricular association's "leaders" are working to try to implement it for state championship games.  They have been kept at bay so far but I fear they may soon prevail.

mbyron

  • Guest
Re: Interesting Take On What We Do
« Reply #5 on: October 08, 2011, 07:34:23 AM »
Stay tuned...I know a state which shall remain nameless where the state HS extracurricular association's "leaders" are working to try to implement it for state championship games.  They have been kept at bay so far but I fear they may soon prevail.
That's what happened here in Ohio with basketball: since OHSAA controls the venue and can maintain the same conditions for every team from game to game, they allow replay during the state championships. The same rationale could work for football, and for the same reason. I expect that to happen soon.