This is the actual wording of the rule variation in the UIL football manual:
8. A free kick out of bound between the goal lines untouched inbounds by a player of Team B is a foul (A.R.
6-2-1-I-IV). PENALTY—Live-ball foul. Five yards from the previous spot or the receiving team may put the
ball in play 20 yards beyond Team A’s restraining line at the inbounds spot (S19).
And the approved ruling:
IV. Team A’s kickoff from their 30 yard line rolls out of bounds untouched by Team B at B’s 38. RULING: B may snap the ball at their own 38, 30, or accept the penalty against A for illegal procedure.
I think if the intent is to only change the receiving team's option from 30 yards to 20 yards, the six-man exception is poorly worded, because unlike in the original rule it does not mention the option of "five yards from the spot where the subsequent dead ball belongs to Team B" even though it mentions the parts before and after that. We've been offering teams all three options as they would have in 11-man, but a few coaches have said that is a six-man exception and they didn't get the option of five yards from the OOB spot. I originally chalked it up to coaches' tendency to tell us everything that goes against them is a six-man exception and shouldn't be enforced, but now I can see why they would say that. If there's any communication between TASO and UIL that could have that clarified it would be nice.
When you say the IG rule does not apply to six-man, are you saying there can never be a foul in six-man for intentional grounding? The exception says that the last sentence of 7-3-2-h does not apply, so there still would have to be a Team A player (since they're all eligible receivers) in the area or the passer has to have been outside the tackle box and the ball cross the neutral zone, right?
Thanks for replying... I know six-man topics don't get much attention on this forum and I didn't want to create confusion/controversy by asking on SMF.com!