« previous next »
Pages: [1]

Author Topic: Illegal Helmut Hit/Targeting?  (Read 5143 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Curious

  • *
  • Posts: 1314
  • FAN REACTION: +36/-50
Illegal Helmut Hit/Targeting?
« on: December 21, 2011, 08:57:38 AM »
What do y'all think?  Hope the link works (and sorry if this one has already been discussed).

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tAJFdgbXioI&feature=uploademail

Logged

Offline Curious

  • *
  • Posts: 1314
  • FAN REACTION: +36/-50
Re: Illegal Helmut Hit/Targeting?
« Reply #1 on: December 21, 2011, 08:59:16 AM »
Sorry, really wrong furum; but illegal helmut contact could apply for HS as well.
Logged

Offline TampaSteve

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 1534
  • FAN REACTION: +24/-13
Re: Illegal Helmut Hit/Targeting?
« Reply #2 on: December 21, 2011, 09:38:27 AM »
'targeting' - not HS.
'HelmEt' - yes.

BiB - nope
(just in case someone asks too)
Logged

Offline Curious

  • *
  • Posts: 1314
  • FAN REACTION: +36/-50
Re: Illegal Helmut Hit/Targeting?
« Reply #3 on: December 21, 2011, 11:37:38 AM »
Quote from: TampaSteve on December 21, 2011, 09:38:27 AM
'targeting' - not HS.
'HelmEt' - yes.

BiB - nope
(just in case someone asks too)

Totally agree about the BIB; but it looked to me like any helmet contact by the blocker was with the side of his helmet and the result of his shoulder block.....
Logged

Offline bama_stripes

  • *
  • Posts: 3145
  • FAN REACTION: +124/-29
Re: Illegal Helmut Hit/Targeting?
« Reply #4 on: December 22, 2011, 11:47:55 AM »
Quote from: Curious on December 21, 2011, 11:37:38 AM
Totally agree about the BIB; but it looked to me like any helmet contact by the blocker was with the side of his helmet and the result of his shoulder block.....

Agree. No foul in either case.
Logged

jjseikel

  • Guest
Re: Illegal Helmut Hit/Targeting?
« Reply #5 on: December 22, 2011, 12:55:47 PM »
No foul. Side block. Initial contact was on the shoulder.

Common-tators are idiots!
Logged
Pages: [1]
« previous next »