Author Topic: 2012 CFO Philosophies  (Read 20959 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

El Macman

  • Guest
2012 CFO Philosophies
« on: February 07, 2012, 12:21:18 PM »
CFO PHILOSOPHIES OF OFFICIATING
Updated by CFO Coordinators
1/31/2012

Ball-Spotting
• The ball can be placed on a yardline to begin the next series after a change possession. For example, if a punt return ends with the ball between team B’s 33 and 34 yardlines, move the ball forward to team B’s 34 yardline. At all other times, the ball is placed where it became dead. (Exception: If the change of possession occurs on a fourth-down running or passing play, the ball will be left at the dead-ball spot to begin the next series.)

Line of Scrimmage
• Officials will work to keep offensive linemen legal and will call a foul only when obvious or when a warning to the player and a subsequent warning to the coach are ignored. Don’t wait till the fourth quarter to enforce the rule.
• If the offensive player is lined up with his head clearly behind the rear end of the snapper, a foul will be called without a warning.
• Don’t be technical on an offensive player who is a wide receiver or slot back in determining if he is off the line of scrimmage. When in question, it is not a foul.
• Wide receivers or slot backs lined up outside a tight end will be ruled on the line of scrimmage and covering the tight end if there is no stagger between their alignments. If in question, the tight end is not covered up.
• When in question regarding player position on movement by the defense into the neutral zone which causes the offense to move, a player is moving toward the offensive player. This protects both that player and the two adjacent offensive players.
• Anytime a defensive player jumps toward the neutral zone and there is a question whether he was in the neutral zone and the appropriate offensive player(s) moves, shut the play down and penalize the defense.
• Anytime a defensive player shoots the gap, and there is a question as to contact, err on the side of offside and shut the play down to avoid a free shot on the quarterback.
• Formations during the execution of a trick or unusual play have the highest degree of scrutiny and should be completely legal.
• When in question, a quick or abrupt movement by the center or quarterback is a false start.

Fumbles
• When in question, the runner fumbled the ball and was not down.
• When in question regarding whether the quarterback passed or fumbled, it will be ruled a fumble.

Defensive Pass Interference
Actions that constitute defensive pass interference include, but are not limited to, the following six categories:
• Early contact by a defender who is not playing the ball is defensive pass interference provided the other requirements for defensive pass interference have been met, regardless of how deep the pass is thrown to the receiver.
• Playing through the back of a receiver in an attempt to make a play on the ball.
• Grabbing and restricting a receiver’s arm(s) or body in such a manner that restricts his opportunity to catch a pass.
• Extending an arm across the body (arm bar) of a receiver thus restricting his ability to catch a pass, regardless of whether or not the defender is looking for the ball.
• Cutting off or riding the receiver out of the path to the ball by making contact with him without playing the ball.
• Hooking and restricting a receiver in an attempt to get to the ball in such a manner that causes the receiver’s body to turn prior to the ball arriving.

Offensive Pass Interference
Actions that constitute offensive pass interference include but are not limited to the following four categories:
• Initiating contact with a defender by shoving or pushing off thus creating separation in an attempt to catch a pass.
• Driving through a defender who has established a position on the field.
• Blocking downfield during a pass that legally crosses the line of scrimmage.
• Picking off a defender who is attempting to cover a receiver.

Not Offensive Pass Interference
• Offensive pass interference for blocking downfield will not be called if the passer is legally grounding the ball out of bounds, near or beyond the sideline.
• Offensive pass interference will not be called on a screen pass when the ball is overthrown behind the line of scrimmage but subsequently lands beyond the expanded line of scrimmage (up to three yards) and linemen are blocking downfield, unless such blocking prevents a defensive player from catching the ball.
• It is not offensive pass interference on a pick play if the defensive player is blocking the offensive player when the contact occurs and doesn’t make a separate action, or if the contact occurs within one yard of the line of scrimmage.
Other Passing Situations
• When determining if an untouched pass is beyond the line of scrimmage, the neutral zone will be expanded one yard.
• When in question on action against the passer, it is roughing the passer if the defender’s intent is to punish.
• The quarterback can throw the ball anywhere if he is not under duress, except spiking the ball straight down. The clock is not a factor. Exception: Rule 7-3-2-e allows the quarterback to spike the ball to stop the clock.
• An uncatchable pass must be blatantly uncatchable in order to disregard a foul for pass interference
• If the quarterback is outside the tackle box and is throwing the ball away to avoid a sack, when in question as to whether the ball is beyond the neutral zone, it is beyond the line. Don’t be technical.
• If the passer is contacted after he starts his passing motion, then it may be ruled no intentional grounding due to this contact.
• If the passer is contacted clearly before he starts his passing motion, then there will be a foul for intentional grounding if there is no eligible receiver in the vicinity or if the pass does not reach the line of scrimmage after the quarterback has been outside the tackle box.
• If an interception is near the goal line (inside the one yardline) and there is a question as to whether possession is gained in the field of play or end zone, make the play a touchback.
• If the passer is legally throwing the ball away out of bounds, near or beyond the sideline, do not penalize the offense for having ineligible players downfield.

Blocking
• Takedowns at the point of attack, those in the open field, within the tackle box and affecting the result of the play create special focus and should be called in those situations.
• If there is a potential offensive holding but the action occurs clearly away from the point of attack and has no (or could have no) effect on the play, offensive holding should not be called.
• If there is a potential for defensive holding but the action occurs clearly away from the point of attack and has no (or could have no) effect on the play, defensive holding should not be called. Example: A defensive back on the opposite side of the field holding a wide receiver on a designed run play to the other side.
• For blocks in the back, if one hand is on the number and the other hand is on the side and the initial force is on the number, it is a block in the back. The force of the block could be slight and still a foul if the contact propels the player past the runner or prevents him from making the play. If the force is clearly on the side, it is not a foul. If the blocker is in a “chase mode” all the action must be on the side.
• Blocks that start on the side and subsequently end up in the back are not fouls as long as contact is maintained throughout the block.
• Blocks in the back that occur at or about the same time a runner is being tackled shall not be called, unless they are personal foul in nature.
• A grab of the receiver’s jersey that restricts the receiver and takes away his feet should be defensive holding if other criteria are met, and could also be defensive pass interference.
• Holding can be called even if the quarterback is subsequently sacked as it may be the other half of an offset foul.
• Illegal block in the back can still be called on fair catches, but not if the illegal block occurs away from the play as the fair catch is being made or the touchback occurs and contact is slight (personal foul type actions should always be called).
• Blocks in the back that are personal fouls in nature should be called regardless of their timing relative to the runner being tackled.
• Rarely should you have a hold on a double team block unless there is a takedown or the defender breaks the double team and is pulled back.
• When in question if an illegal block occurs in the end zone or field of play, it occurs in the field of play.

Kicking Play
• The kicker’s restraining line on onside and short pooch kickoffs should be officiated as a plane. Any player (other than the kicker or holder) breaking the plane before the ball is kicked should be called for offside. The same plane applies on normal kickoffs, but officials should not be too technical in regard to players breaking the plane.
• On a kickoff that results in a touchback, there is no foul for an illegal wedge formation.
• Illegal block in the back can be called on fair catches, but not if the illegal block occurs away from the play as the fair catch is being made, or the play results in a touchback and contact is slight. (Note: Personal fouls should always be called.)
• Blocks in the back that are personal fouls should be called regardless of their timing relative to a fair catch.
• It shall always be roughing the kicker if there is forcible contact to the plant leg, whether that leg is on the ground or not. It shall be running into the kicker if a defender simply "runs through" the kicking leg.
• All other contact shall be based on the severity and the potential for injury to the kicker.

Plays at the Sideline
• If legal contact occurs before the runner has a foot down out of bounds, consider it a legal hit.
• If the whistle has blown and a runner continuing to advance down the sideline has eased up, contact by the opponent against the runner is a foul. Officials should be alert and be sure any action is not part of the initial play before calling a foul.
• When in question as to whether the runner stepped out of bounds, officials should rule the runner did not step out of bounds.

Scoring Plays
• When in question, it is not a touchdown.
• When in question, it is not a safety.
• A non-airborne runner crossing the goal inside the pylon with the ball crossing the goal line extended is a touchdown.

Personal Fouls
• If action is deemed to be “fighting,” the player must be disqualified. When in question if an act is a flagrant personal foul or fighting, the player is not fighting.
• Players committing flagrant personal fouls must be disqualified.
• When in question regarding hits away from the ball near the end of the play, consider it a dead-ball rather than live-ball foul.
• Spitting on an opponent requires disqualification.

Unsportsmanlike Conduct
• Do not be overly technical in applying Rule 9-2-1.
• Allow for brief, spontaneous, emotional reactions at the end of a play.
• Beyond the brief, spontaneous bursts of energy, officials should flag those acts that are clearly prolonged, self-congratulatory, and that make a mockery of the game.
• A list of specifically prohibited acts is in Rule 9-2-1 (a) thru (h). That list is intended to be illustrative and not exhaustive. All agree that when those acts are clearly intended to taunt or demean, they should be penalized.

Game Clock
• 5/5 axiom: In order to adjust game clock errors, there must be more than a five-second differential if there is more than five minutes remaining in either half.
• Any time loss due to the clock being started erroneously, such as when a dead-ball foul is called, the clock must be adjusted.
• As a guideline, referees should consider invoking Rule 3-4-3 when the game clock is under five minutes of each half.

Miscellaneous
• The ankle or wrist are considered part of the foot or hand, respectively and do not make a runner down.

Offline zebra99

  • *
  • Posts: 605
  • FAN REACTION: +30/-3
Re: 2012 CFO Philosophies
« Reply #1 on: February 07, 2012, 02:33:13 PM »
thanks - have you figured out the changes yet?

Offline jg-me

  • *
  • Posts: 416
  • FAN REACTION: +22/-4
Re: 2012 CFO Philosophies
« Reply #2 on: February 07, 2012, 03:02:41 PM »
May have missed something, but here is a list of additions and/or changes in verbage.

Anytime a defensive player jumps toward the neutral zone and there is a question whether he was in the neutral zone and the appropriate offensive player(s) moves, shut the play down and penalize the defense.

When in question, a quick or abrupt movement by the center or quarterback is a false start.

Offensive Pass Interference
Actions that constitute offensive pass interference include but are not limited to the following four categories:
• Initiating contact with a defender by shoving or pushing off thus creating separation in an attempt to catch a pass.
• Driving through a defender who has established a position on the field.
• Blocking downfield during a pass that legally crosses the line of scrimmage.
• Picking off a defender who is attempting to cover a receiver.

Offensive pass interference for blocking downfield will not be called if the passer is legally grounding the ball out of bounds, near or beyond the sideline.

It is not offensive pass interference on a pick play if the defensive player is blocking the offensive player when the contact occurs and doesn’t make a separate action, or if the contact occurs within one yard of the line of scrimmage.

An uncatchable pass must be blatantly uncatchable in order to disregard a foul for pass interference

If the passer is contacted after he starts his passing motion, then it may be ruled no intentional grounding due to this contact.

If the passer is contacted clearly before he starts his passing motion, then there will be a foul for intentional grounding if there is no eligible receiver in the vicinity or if the pass does not reach the line of scrimmage after the quarterback has been outside the tackle box.

Blocks that start on the side and subsequently end up in the back are not fouls as long as contact is maintained throughout the block.
• Blocks in the back that occur at or about the same time a runner is being tackled shall not be called, unless they are personal foul in nature.

It shall always be roughing the kicker if there is forcible contact to the plant leg, whether that leg is on the ground or not. It shall be running into the kicker if a defender simply "runs through" the kicking leg.
• All other contact shall be based on the severity and the potential for injury to the kicker.

When in question, it is not a safety.

Miscellaneous
• The ankle or wrist are considered part of the foot or hand, respectively and do not make a runner down.

El Macman

  • Guest
Re: 2012 CFO Philosophies
« Reply #3 on: February 07, 2012, 03:29:14 PM »
thanks - have you figured out the changes yet?

Naw - don't have my CCA manual with me here at the office. But, I think "near or beyond the sideline" has been added to OPI and IDP scenarios related to intentioanl grounding. Good.

"Intent to punish" strikes me as being new, with regard to roughing the passer. Is it? Good, regardless.

I'll check more thoroughly this evening.

But, there are two that are "by rule," not by philosophy. They really don't need to be here - 1) no 'wedge' foul if a touchback, and 2) TD for non-airborne runner passing inside pylon with ball breaking plane of goal line extended (that's always been true, by rule - even before the mass revisions by RR in the past two years).

Now, I find it humorous that they consider the ankle part of the foot. Tell me how a normal adult can have his ankle touching the ground without his knee or some part of his lower leg also touching the ground - unless his ankle/leg is broken? OK - if he can pull it off, he can keep running. Try to touch the ground with your ankle? Can you do it without your lower leg/knee also touching? I didn't think so.  :D
« Last Edit: February 07, 2012, 05:05:02 PM by El Macman »

Offline FLbackjudge

  • *
  • Posts: 130
  • FAN REACTION: +2/-0
Re: 2012 CFO Philosophies
« Reply #4 on: February 07, 2012, 04:04:27 PM »
I believe I could touch my ankle to the ground without touching my lower leg or knee if I were lying on top of a defender or team mate who was prone or supine on the ground.  Nonetheless, I agree that it's at least going to be a rare, if not impossible, scenario.

El Macman

  • Guest
Re: 2012 CFO Philosophies
« Reply #5 on: February 07, 2012, 05:19:15 PM »
I believe I could touch my ankle to the ground without touching my lower leg or knee if I were lying on top of a defender or team mate who was prone or supine on the ground.  Nonetheless, I agree that it's at least going to be a rare, if not impossible, scenario.

You believe it? But you haven't tried it...eh?  ;D

Offline RedTD

  • *
  • Posts: 117
  • FAN REACTION: +5/-2
Re: 2012 CFO Philosophies
« Reply #6 on: February 07, 2012, 05:23:08 PM »
In the past two years plays were reversed by replay when they ruled the runner down because an ankle/lower leg and wrist had contacted the ground. Hence a "philosophy" that the ankle and wrist are part of the foot or hand to make the rule on "hand or foot down" more flexible.

Diablo

  • Guest
Re: 2012 CFO Philosophies
« Reply #7 on: February 07, 2012, 06:46:41 PM »
Is 

"• Formations during the execution of a trick or unusual play have the highest degree of scrutiny and should be completely legal."

intended to trump

"• Don’t be technical on an offensive player who is a wide receiver or slot back in determining if he is off the line of scrimmage. When in question, it is not a foul.
• Wide receivers or slot backs lined up outside a tight end will be ruled on the line of scrimmage and covering the tight end if there is no stagger between their alignments. If in question, the tight end is not covered up."

and an unwarned Team A player whose head overlaps the butt of the snapper, but does not break the plane of his waistline?

El Macman

  • Guest
Re: 2012 CFO Philosophies
« Reply #8 on: February 07, 2012, 07:29:24 PM »
In the past two years plays were reversed by replay when they ruled the runner down because an ankle/lower leg and wrist had contacted the ground. Hence a "philosophy" that the ankle and wrist are part of the foot or hand to make the rule on "hand or foot down" more flexible.

Show me video evidence of an ankle touching the ground WITHOUT the lower leg or knee also touching (and I think I'll show you a broken ankle).

El Macman

  • Guest
Re: 2012 CFO Philosophies
« Reply #9 on: February 08, 2012, 07:42:35 AM »

The new stuff. Some "new stuff" is embedded in previous items, and are highlighted by bold italics.

Line of Scrimmage
• Anytime a defensive player jumps toward the neutral zone and there is a question whether he was in the neutral zone and the appropriate offensive player(s) moves, shut the play down and penalize the defense.
• When in question, a quick or abrupt movement by the center or quarterback is a false start.

Offensive Pass Interference
• Blocking downfield during a pass that legally crosses the line of scrimmage.
• Picking off a defender who is attempting to cover a receiver.

Not Offensive Pass Interference
• Offensive pass interference for blocking downfield will not be called if the passer is legally grounding the ball out of bounds, near or beyond the sideline.
• It is not offensive pass interference on a pick play if the defensive player is blocking the offensive player when the contact occurs and doesn’t make a separate action, or if the contact occurs within one yard of the line of scrimmage.

Other Passing Situations
• An uncatchable pass must be blatantly uncatchable in order to disregard a foul for pass interference
• If the passer is contacted after he starts his passing motion, then it may be ruled no intentional grounding due to this contact.
• If the passer is contacted clearly before he starts his passing motion, then there will be a foul for intentional grounding if there is no eligible receiver in the vicinity or if the pass does not reach the line of scrimmage after the quarterback has been outside the tackle box.
• If the passer is legally throwing the ball away out of bounds, near or beyond the sideline, do not penalize the offense for having ineligible players downfield.

Blocking
• Blocks that start on the side and subsequently end up in the back are not fouls as long as contact is maintained throughout the block.
• Blocks in the back that occur at or about the same time a runner is being tackled shall not be called, unless they are personal foul in nature.

Kicking Play
• It shall always be roughing the kicker if there is forcible contact to the plant leg, whether that leg is on the ground or not. It shall be running into the kicker if a defender simply "runs through" the kicking leg.
• All other contact shall be based on the severity and the potential for injury to the kicker.

Scoring Plays
• When in question, it is not a safety.

Miscellaneous
• The ankle or wrist are considered part of the foot or hand, respectively and do not make a runner down.


The very first new item will need consistent support by the coordinators. But, then, this document, in theory, means the coordinators buy into this and will support these calls. Right?

Offline Dakota Dan

  • *
  • Posts: 111
  • FAN REACTION: +9/-1
  • ΦΑ ΣAE SD Theta
Re: 2012 CFO Philosophies
« Reply #10 on: February 08, 2012, 01:57:59 PM »
"Line of Scrimmage
• Anytime a defensive player jumps toward the neutral zone and there is a question whether he was in the neutral zone and the appropriate offensive player(s) moves, shut the play down and penalize the defense."


Do you think that the NFL supervisors are bringing in the NFL Neutral Zone Infraction (NZI) into the college game?


" • When in question, a quick or abrupt movement by the center or quarterback is a false start. "

This is good move, the past couple years the centers have figured out that they can draw the DE's offside with that head snap (QB in Shotgun formation) and the LOS guys have been tagging the DE's with DOF because they were reacting the the Centers quick movement. 


El Macman

  • Guest
Re: 2012 CFO Philosophies
« Reply #11 on: February 08, 2012, 02:38:32 PM »
"Line of Scrimmage
• Anytime a defensive player jumps toward the neutral zone and there is a question whether he was in the neutral zone and the appropriate offensive player(s) moves, shut the play down and penalize the defense."

Do you think that the NFL supervisors are bringing in the NFL Neutral Zone Infraction (NZI) into the college game?

Yes. I don't know that we'll use that terminology, but that's the bottom line effect. For at least a half-century, the basic concept was that the offense was responsible for not starting early, since they know the snap count. So, when a defensive player made a legitimate move, to which an offensive lineman reacted, the offensive player was at fault - false start. But, it seems that, more and more, somebody - coaches  and/or coordinators - wants to further absolve the offense when Team B does something to cause Team A to react before the ball can be snapped, even if they don't enter the NZ. But, it looks like we'll still have the distinction of moving "toward" the NZ, versus horizontally or lifting up (legitimately). This is closer to an actual rule change than just a 'philosophy,' but I'm OK with it. Maybe it should become rule.


" • When in question, a quick or abrupt movement by the center or quarterback is a false start. "

This is good move, the past couple years the centers have figured out that they can draw the DE's offside with that head snap (QB in Shotgun formation) and the LOS guys have been tagging the DE's with DOF because they were reacting the the Centers quick movement. 



Yeah, those snappers have been coached to push that envelope, and it hasn't been officiated as consistently as it needs to be. But I'm confident it will get cleaned up, especially with this philosphical point of emphasis.

texref

  • Guest
Re: 2012 CFO Philosophies
« Reply #12 on: February 08, 2012, 03:43:42 PM »
El Mac,

Where can I find this on the CFO site? I'm looking but cannot find it.

Thanks.

El Macman

  • Guest
Re: 2012 CFO Philosophies
« Reply #13 on: February 08, 2012, 05:32:27 PM »
El Mac,

Where can I find this on the CFO site? I'm looking but cannot find it.

Thanks.

You probably can't. You should probably take it with a grain of salt until it gets published in the CCA Manual, or otherwise published.


texref

  • Guest
Re: 2012 CFO Philosophies
« Reply #14 on: February 08, 2012, 07:06:56 PM »
You probably can't. You should probably take it with a grain of salt until it gets published in the CCA Manual, or otherwise published.

Cool. Thanks.

Offline James

  • *
  • Posts: 692
  • FAN REACTION: +7/-6
Re: 2012 CFO Philosophies
« Reply #15 on: February 09, 2012, 12:18:22 AM »
You believe it? But you haven't tried it...eh?  ;D
I tried it just now at my desk. Not in a running motion, but still if my foot is on the ground and rolls to the outside I can have my ankle on the ground with my knee about 3/4 of a foot above the ground (leg about 45 degrees). I need my hand on the ground to support my weight but it is definitely 'doable'.
And I am NOT particularly flexible.

El Macman

  • Guest
Re: 2012 CFO Philosophies
« Reply #16 on: February 09, 2012, 06:53:01 AM »
I tried it just now at my desk. Not in a running motion, but still if my foot is on the ground and rolls to the outside I can have my ankle on the ground with my knee about 3/4 of a foot above the ground (leg about 45 degrees). I need my hand on the ground to support my weight but it is definitely 'doable'.
And I am NOT particularly flexible.

I give.  deadhorse:

Offline Osric Pureheart

  • *
  • Posts: 592
  • FAN REACTION: +18/-7
  • 1373937 or 308?
Re: 2012 CFO Philosophies
« Reply #17 on: February 09, 2012, 08:54:31 AM »
I tried it just now at my desk. Not in a running motion, but still if my foot is on the ground and rolls to the outside I can have my ankle on the ground with my knee about 3/4 of a foot above the ground (leg about 45 degrees). I need my hand on the ground to support my weight but it is definitely 'doable'.
And I am NOT particularly flexible.

Did your supervisor think you were down by rule?  Or did he just say "what the hell are you doing?"

Offline RS

  • *
  • Posts: 38
  • FAN REACTION: +3/-0
Re: 2012 CFO Philosophies
« Reply #18 on: February 09, 2012, 01:26:43 PM »
Wait until you here about a fair catch on a grounded onside attempt.

El Macman

  • Guest
Re: 2012 CFO Philosophies
« Reply #19 on: February 09, 2012, 01:29:54 PM »
Wait until you here about a fair catch on a grounded onside attempt.

OK, we'll wait.

ABoselli

  • Guest
Re: 2012 CFO Philosophies
« Reply #20 on: February 09, 2012, 04:44:43 PM »
I don't want to wait. Tell us now.

Offline RS

  • *
  • Posts: 38
  • FAN REACTION: +3/-0
Re: 2012 CFO Philosophies
« Reply #21 on: February 10, 2012, 07:33:04 AM »
R will be able to call a fair catch on a grounded onside kick that goes higher than R's head.

El Macman

  • Guest
Re: 2012 CFO Philosophies
« Reply #22 on: February 10, 2012, 08:17:56 AM »
R will be able to call a fair catch on a grounded onside kick that goes higher than R's head.

Hmmm. Missed that one in the rule changes announcement. Perhaps it is 'pork' legislation hidden among one of the publicized changes. It is an election year, you know.

Offline Osric Pureheart

  • *
  • Posts: 592
  • FAN REACTION: +18/-7
  • 1373937 or 308?
Re: 2012 CFO Philosophies
« Reply #23 on: February 10, 2012, 11:45:24 AM »
What's the betting that if that's real, at least one Div I-A team will field a hands team composed entirely of dwarves?  Does Warwick Davis have any eligibility?

Offline RS

  • *
  • Posts: 38
  • FAN REACTION: +3/-0
Re: 2012 CFO Philosophies
« Reply #24 on: February 10, 2012, 02:25:58 PM »
A player of the receiving team who is in position to receive the ball has the same kick-catch & fair catch protection whether the ball is kicked directly off the tee OR is immediately driven to the ground, strikes the ground once & goes into the air in the manner of the ball kicked directly off the tee.