Recent Posts

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 10
51
NCAA Discussion / Re: Rules Changes Document
« Last post by ElvisLives on April 10, 2026, 10:45:21 PM »
2026 Rule Changes
-Targeting disqualification reduction
Don’t care. Not our problem. That’s for governing bodies to worry about. Target in a game, and you’re done for the game. That’s all we care about.

-Scrimmage kick formation numbering exceptions
They are on the right track, but they’ve left ambiguities. So, does this mean they MUST have two linemen on each side of the snapper to qualify as a SKF? If so, and they are all ineligible, regardless of numbers, then I believe the problem is solved. There are your ineligibles (regardless of their numbers).
And I hope this is the case. Team A will simply not be able to confuse Team B regarding eligibles, if they MUST have two players adjacent to the snapper, on each side of the snapper. We shall see.

-10-yard penalty for OPI. Not a fan, personally, but it is no skin off my nose. If that’s what they want, so be it.

-Play Clock after review after the 2-minute time out (play clock “freezes” where it is when stopped for the review)
The biggest problem here will be making sure the PCO pays close attention and only STOPS the play clock when the crew stops the clock for the review - and he doesn’t reset it. Hopefully, the play clock always shows up on video available to the RO, so he can get the play clock set correctly, if needed.

-UNS fouls being relaxed. No surprise. IMHO, not good for the game, but I’m not in charge. I’m guessing they’ll be able to do nearly anything they want as long as they don’t direct it at an opponent.

-Additional Replay Challenge
Where will it end?

-Fair Catch Kick
Looks like a hybrid of a kickoff and a scrimmage kick. Kickoff rules to put the ball in play, but scrimmage kick field goal rules thereafter. That should be easy enough. But, no mention of the clock. Does it start on the kick? When legally touched in the field of play? Fortunately, most of us will never see one. But, we gotta know what to do if it happens.

52
National Football League / Re: Regime; culture
« Last post by ElvisLives on April 10, 2026, 10:01:39 PM »
I definitely don't disagree with you, but can you modify the above - this is a public forum, and someone will someday come across that statement, and will invariably use it to support the tinfoil hat theory that the NFL is directing officials as to the outcomes they want for games, not specific calls/no calls.

I won’t often allow myself to be censored or convinced to modify a statement. But, in this case, purely for the sake of those working in the NFL - particularly those I know - I modified my statement to clarify New York’s real-time involvement in games. No, I do not believe that New York is providing any direction to officials and ROs with respect to outcomes of games. Just that they don’t give the respect to their officials and ROs that they deserve, and trust that they know what they are doing - which they do. If New York wants to officiate the games by remote video then, best of luck to ‘em.
53
National Football League / Re: Regime; culture
« Last post by dammitbobby on April 10, 2026, 06:58:33 PM »
I definitely don't disagree with you, but can you modify the above - this is a public forum, and someone will someday come across that statement, and will invariably use it to support the tinfoil hat theory that the NFL is directing officials as to the outcomes they want for games, not specific calls/no calls.
54
Breaking news:
Tech just announced that, yes, they will play Houston on Friday, 9/18, and they will play the Thanksgiving Day game at Jerry World vs TCU. And the official schedule has been updated since this morning to reflect that!

Etref must have had some good ‘inside information.’  :thumbup
55
NCAA Discussion / Re: Down of the Day
« Last post by ElvisLives on April 10, 2026, 05:08:29 PM »
When you say B99 "slaps" the ball, I assume you mean he "bats" it., If so, this is a foul for an illegal bat, enforce from the previous spot and A will rekick from the A45, or decline and then the result of the play is a Touchback. B 1/10 B-25 , lateral position, snap
Clock is correct.

Yes (on the ruling). It might seem somewhat natural to rule a safety, since, in any other situation, batting a loose ball in the end zone is a foul, resulting in a safety. But, not on a free kick. Until the ball is possessed, the previous spot is the enforcement spot for most fouls (which includes illegal batting) DURING THE KICK on a free kick. Even though touched by B, the status of the ball was still a free kick when the batting occurred.

I try not to use a term that directly describes the action as a foul. With as little judgment as possible, I want the reader to decide if something is a foul - or not - by describing the action as accurately as possible, and in a way that leaves no doubt as to whether the action is, or is not, a foul. I would hope that everyone would rule ‘slapping’ the ball as ‘batting’ the ball.
(However, I checked for synonyms of ‘slap,’ hoping to find ‘bat,’ but didn’t. I still think officials would equate a slap, or slapping, the ball, with batting.  ;D )
56
NCAA Discussion / Re: Rules Changes Document
« Last post by ElvisLives on April 10, 2026, 04:42:39 PM »
So can you spike the ball now after a TD?

Just don’t do it ‘at’ an opponent.That will be the standard for many actions.
57
National Football League / Regime; culture
« Last post by ElvisLives on April 10, 2026, 04:40:34 PM »
For any of you aspiring to the NFL, be careful - or at least fully aware - of what you are asking for (and what you’ll actually get).

No, I’ve never been there. But, I worked on the field, in FBS football, with many past, and current NFL officials. There was a time when the environment in the NFL was one of respect and trust of, by, and for their officials. Even the inception of replay was embraced by the officials, and used as a tool to make sure the games were played within the spirit and intent of the rules of the game.
Yes, errors are made. Always have, and always will, as long as humans are involved. Even in the face of intense scrutiny, as long as that scrutiny was by persons truly, and fully, qualified to review and evaluate officials, the environment was positive. From many, I have heard, “If we made an error, show us, and we’ll all learn from it, and get better.” It was a good environment, and served the game at the highest level possible.
For the longest time, NFL officiating trainers and evaluators were retired veteran NFL officials. Who better to perform these valuable services?
Then, one day, a certain VP of Officiating decided it would be a good idea to start using ex-coaches and ex-players - WITH ZERO ON-FIELD OFFICIATING EXPERIENCE - as evaluators and trainers. Slowly at first, starting with just one. Then, over time, more and more, until there are now a large group of these folks hanging out at 345 Park Avenue, New York, many of whom have close direct ties to teams and active coaches. Active coaches are contacting these folks with ‘comments’ about the officiating in their games. Most of the comments turn into things like, “That wasn’t enough for a holding foul in the NFL.” Or, “That call didn’t need to be made at that point in that game.” These coaches/players have never worked a game as an official, and have not put in any significant time in learning the rules and interpretations, or understanding mechanics and HOW to officiate a game. These guys pore over video with multiple views of every action - in extremely slow motion - in an effort to help their buddies on the teams. Officials get ONE look at all action, and “get it right” an incredibly high percentage of the time.
If that isn’t bad enough, the execs have their favorites. Not their fault, or anything they do to become a favorite, but, for a variety of reasons, some officials are favorites, and don’t get the scrutiny that other officials get. I will go on record as saying that nearly all of the non-favorites are exceptional officials, who deserve to be in the NFL, and belong there. Yet, almost every year, one or more of these exceptional officials get released for ‘poor performance.’ Leading up to their dismissal, the execs search for things - almost anything - they can find to downgrade these non-favorites. By doing so, and releasing these folks, the execs can claim they are holding officials accountable, and making officiating better.
The truth is, in most cases, they release officials - good officials, in reality - with a good number of years of experience, and replace them with ….who? Someone with no NFL experience. Talk about shooting yourself in the foot.
And, in the past several years, New York is becoming more and more involved in providing input to the RO and on-field officials with regard to rulings. They may disagree with the RO, and provide direction on what they see as the correct ruling. This has not been widely known, but, recently, the NFL made it public and reported that, yes, the Command Center in New York will have the ability to provide input to the RO and crew during games, when they deem necessary. Not the epitome of showing confidence in their on-field staff and ROs.
Oh, and even this toxic environment extends to ROs. Even if New York gives direction on something, if things “go sideways,” they have been known to throw the RO under the bus.
I can’t tell you how many NFL folks I have heard say how they used to have fun and enjoy being an NFL official. But, now, it just isn’t any fun. If it wasn’t for the money (which is just a micro-fraction of the total NFL budget), they would walk away.
This started with one guy, who, amazingly, is still hanging around. I’ve never known a person who is more disliked by those ‘below’ that person. And for a long time now. Sadly, this environment may not go away, even when he, finally, goes away. But, it would be a good start.

So, if you aspire to the NFL, be sure to keep your eyes and ears open. It may not be the Promised Land you think it is.

Good luck to everyone, NFL or otherwise.

58
NCAA Discussion / Re: Rules Changes Document
« Last post by bossman72 on April 10, 2026, 03:49:38 PM »
So can you spike the ball now after a TD?
59
NCAA Discussion / Re: Rules Changes Document
« Last post by dammitbobby on April 10, 2026, 03:04:34 PM »
Well, the others proposed changes are a lot more specific than this one.
60
NCAA Discussion / Re: Down of the Day
« Last post by Stinterp on April 10, 2026, 02:53:11 PM »
When you say B99 "slaps" the ball, I assume you mean he "bats" it., If so, this is a foul for an illegal bat, enforce from the previous spot and A will rekick from the A45, or decline and then the result of the play is a Touchback. B 1/10 B-25 , lateral position, snap
Clock is correct.
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 10