« previous next »
Pages: [1]

Author Topic: Westlake v North Shore  (Read 10139 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline TxSkyBolt

  • *
  • Posts: 2007
  • FAN REACTION: +45/-46
Westlake v North Shore
« on: December 20, 2015, 09:43:08 AM »
4:52 of the second sweep stretch play to L side appears to be a chop.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Logged

Offline oldandold

  • *
  • Posts: 11
  • FAN REACTION: +4/-2
  • Without officials... it is only recess.
Re: Westlake v North Shore
« Reply #1 on: December 20, 2015, 11:11:27 AM »
Is this to be used as a teaching moment, question, or to call out the crew?
Logged

Offline mccormicw

  • *
  • Posts: 295
  • FAN REACTION: +3/-4
Re: Westlake v North Shore
« Reply #2 on: December 20, 2015, 11:18:34 AM »
If I know Bolt, always meant as a teaching tool.  He is blunt but not hateful.
Logged

Offline oldandold

  • *
  • Posts: 11
  • FAN REACTION: +4/-2
  • Without officials... it is only recess.
Re: Westlake v North Shore
« Reply #3 on: December 20, 2015, 11:21:34 AM »
OK Cool, I have never posted before but watched this board a lot.  I get frustrated with some folks that all they seem to like to do is poke holes in other crews.  Every one makes mistakes every game but some across as if they don't.  No one has worked a perfect game.  Never will.

Thanks for the information!
Logged

Offline mccormicw

  • *
  • Posts: 295
  • FAN REACTION: +3/-4
Re: Westlake v North Shore
« Reply #4 on: December 20, 2015, 11:30:15 AM »
Logged

Offline TxSkyBolt

  • *
  • Posts: 2007
  • FAN REACTION: +45/-46
Re: Westlake v North Shore
« Reply #5 on: December 20, 2015, 11:33:05 AM »
Thought it was unusual because the defender had just disengaged with the offensive blocker when he was blocked low.  Thought it might generate some good discussion.
Logged

Offline mccormicw

  • *
  • Posts: 295
  • FAN REACTION: +3/-4
Re: Westlake v North Shore
« Reply #6 on: December 20, 2015, 11:44:54 AM »
Doesn't tell entire story but may be helpful

[attachment deleted by admin]
Logged

Online DallasLJ

  • *
  • Posts: 568
  • FAN REACTION: +16/-15
Re: Westlake v North Shore
« Reply #7 on: December 20, 2015, 01:07:00 PM »
I think I pass on the CHB.
Logged

Offline TXMike

  • *
  • Posts: 8775
  • FAN REACTION: +229/-269
  • When you quit learning you quit living
Re: Westlake v North Shore
« Reply #8 on: December 20, 2015, 03:32:00 PM »
Similar to the one I posted last week.  How long a delay is required before we consider this 2 distinct blocks.  I assume that is what Dallas LJ sees?  2 independent blocks?
Logged

Online DallasLJ

  • *
  • Posts: 568
  • FAN REACTION: +16/-15
Re: Westlake v North Shore
« Reply #9 on: December 20, 2015, 04:43:39 PM »
Quote from: TXMike on December 20, 2015, 03:32:00 PM
Similar to the one I posted last week.  How long a delay is required before we consider this 2 distinct blocks.  I assume that is what Dallas LJ sees?  2 independent blocks?
  Exactly.  Two different blocks -- not a dangerous Chop Block.  And, yes, I know that when in doubt err on the side of safety, but B comes off the block, turns, tracks the runner and then gets cut.
Logged

Offline first_year_guy

  • *
  • Posts: 103
  • FAN REACTION: +18/-74
  • call what you see, see what you call
Re: Westlake v North Shore
« Reply #10 on: December 20, 2015, 05:59:04 PM »
Appears a chop block to me, the TE never fully disengages from his block
Logged

Offline TxSkyBolt

  • *
  • Posts: 2007
  • FAN REACTION: +45/-46
Westlake v North Shore
« Reply #11 on: December 20, 2015, 08:34:08 PM »
I tend to agree with third-year-guy. I think my supervisor would support the call but would not give a NC if I passed on it.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Logged
Pages: [1]
« previous next »