Author Topic: Announcer in rapture  (Read 20342 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

LarryW60

  • Guest
Re: Announcer in rapture
« Reply #25 on: October 23, 2010, 11:32:34 PM »
I read some of the comments under the video and laughed some more.  After the score, the team's score on the screen increments from 10 to 14 one point at a time.  That was a 4-point touchdown, apparently.

Offline BIG DON

  • Administrator
  • ***
  • Posts: 495
  • FAN REACTION: +53/-0
Re: Announcer in rapture
« Reply #26 on: October 24, 2010, 05:25:43 PM »
no that was only part of the video.   It does go to 6 after the video is cut off.   This is the 2nd year that the guardoline has done video for the games and it basically a mom and pop production and it takes awhile for it to get up dated
do or do not there is no try

chymechowder

  • Guest
Re: Announcer in rapture
« Reply #27 on: October 25, 2010, 12:55:09 PM »
here's another one where the announcer is just as frenzied, but not in a good way.  I know the backward/forward pass can be tricky sometimes, but this one really shouldnt have been killed.

I like how the color commentator screams BOOO!

also funny that the backjudge was the one who retrieved the ball!




LarryW60

  • Guest
Re: Announcer in rapture
« Reply #28 on: October 25, 2010, 01:21:55 PM »
Our general rule is if you're not sure whether the pass was forward or backwards and it hits the ground, rule it an incomplete forward pass.

jimbulger

  • Guest
Re: Announcer in rapture
« Reply #29 on: October 25, 2010, 07:51:11 PM »
(referring to second video)

"nuts and bolts we got screwed"     LOL

now thats just plain funny

busman

  • Guest
Re: Announcer in rapture
« Reply #30 on: October 26, 2010, 10:43:17 AM »
And the kid that scored's father and mother were in a young adult sunday school class I taught when he was born.

After all, Arkansas is a small state.

Offline TXMike

  • *
  • Posts: 8773
  • FAN REACTION: +229/-269
  • When you quit learning you quit living
Re: Announcer in rapture
« Reply #31 on: October 26, 2010, 10:50:31 AM »
You bet it is a small state!!!  That is why President Clinton could not be criminally charged in the case of the "blue dress".  Everyone in Arkansas has the same DNA so "the stain" evidence was not admissible.