Well, after looking at it, I have a different opinion than I thought I would. There should have been three flags (or at least two). It is a textbook targeting. Helmet to helmet and launching. What makes it even worse, it appears that there was intent to injure.
The assistant coach should have spent his energy on his kid's well being instead of directing it at the official. But he did have a right to be angry about the defensive player not being dq'ed. Hopefully the school will take care of that over site.
I do have an issue with the attorney's comments. He seems to think that if the flag had been thrown, the result would have been different. How does the R's apology or suspension change the outcome of the play?