« previous next »
Pages: [1]

Author Topic: "Aiding" the Runner II  (Read 7299 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Diablo

  • Guest
"Aiding" the Runner II
« on: September 15, 2011, 08:07:14 AM »
I came across these recently.  What are y'all's calls?

1.   http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RdUznxCNBvI

2.   http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Qcrgi_NYIo

3.   http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KTBfQKb5OHk

Last, the classic.  Note the teams, score and time remaining.
4.  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pz8rBlhSxeg
Logged

Offline Kalle

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 3414
  • FAN REACTION: +114/-35
Re: "Aiding" the Runner II
« Reply #1 on: September 15, 2011, 09:55:57 AM »
First one, although "pushing the pile", is so blatant that I think it should be called.

Second one is pretty clear cut, foul.

Third is a bit technical IMO, I would pass on it.

On the fourth, I have to confess, I didn't see anything resembling aiding the runner...
Logged

Offline James

  • *
  • Posts: 692
  • FAN REACTION: +7/-6
Re: "Aiding" the Runner II
« Reply #2 on: September 16, 2011, 02:52:19 AM »
In #3 I would have flagged it. The D player couldn't bring down the ball carrier because the 'helper' was holding him up.
In the last one #5 had his hands on the QB and gave a little push, but I don't think it was nearly enough.
Logged

Offline NorCalMike

  • *
  • Posts: 770
  • FAN REACTION: +23/-8
Re: "Aiding" the Runner II
« Reply #3 on: September 16, 2011, 02:58:42 AM »
I would have flagged both 2 and 3.
Logged

Offline blindref757

  • *
  • Posts: 562
  • FAN REACTION: +30/-17
Re: "Aiding" the Runner II
« Reply #4 on: September 16, 2011, 08:23:00 AM »
I'm the first to admit that I don't know where to begin on how to call this.  I am iffy on 2, but 3 is pretty clear cut.  It wasn't called in either game...so that tells me that I shouldnt be calling this at all.  I wish the big timers would realize this as a dilemma for the avocation as it promotes setting aside other rules we don't agree with.  I guess that is how we get rid of bad rules...quit calling it altogether and eventually the coaches (rules committee) will take it out or make it a point of emphasis and demand that we call it.
Logged

Offline HoustonUmp

  • *
  • Posts: 112
  • FAN REACTION: +4/-0
Re: "Aiding" the Runner II
« Reply #5 on: September 16, 2011, 09:24:15 AM »
The way our rules interpreter has told us to enforce this foul is that the only time it should ever come into play is when a teammate of the runner is in front of him and physically pulls him forward.  It should never be called if the teammates are just "adding momentum" from behind.
Logged

Offline Curious

  • *
  • Posts: 1314
  • FAN REACTION: +36/-50
Re: "Aiding" the Runner II
« Reply #6 on: September 16, 2011, 09:34:05 AM »
1. No (can't even SEE the runner)
2 & 3. Hell Yes!  Question: does the replay official have the ability to overturn this base on the obvious?
4. No (didn't see anything)
Logged

ret66482

  • Guest
Re: "Aiding" the Runner II
« Reply #7 on: September 19, 2011, 02:56:20 PM »
IMO #2 and #3 is definitely penalties.  #1 - good call for forward progress!
Logged

Offline bossman72

  • *
  • Posts: 2281
  • FAN REACTION: +309/-29
Re: "Aiding" the Runner II
« Reply #8 on: September 21, 2011, 10:02:27 PM »
The philosophy is that if the runner is PULLED by a teammate, we will flag this.  1 and 4 are legal, 2 and 3 would definitely be fouls.
Logged
Pages: [1]
« previous next »