Author Topic: Southlake-Skyline  (Read 37685 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline TxSkyBolt

  • *
  • Posts: 2007
  • FAN REACTION: +45/-46
Re: Southlake-Skyline
« Reply #50 on: December 15, 2011, 03:12:48 PM »
I think you nailed it Mike.  Same abysmal style of writing. 

rickref

  • Guest
Re: Southlake-Skyline
« Reply #51 on: December 15, 2011, 03:47:41 PM »

Online Etref

  • Administrator
  • ***
  • Posts: 2371
  • FAN REACTION: +87/-29
  • " I don't make the rules coach!"
Re: Southlake-Skyline
« Reply #52 on: December 15, 2011, 04:10:47 PM »
I would have also pointed out the other 100 reasons they lost the game.  Dropped passes, missed blocks, missed tackles, bad play calling, etc.  Those are the real reason they lost.  Blaming the officials for their own shortcomings is a HACK poor job from people we expect to be educators.

Well in fact he did!!!!
" I don't make the rules coach!"

Offline psv

  • *
  • Posts: 279
  • FAN REACTION: +14/-14
Re: Southlake-Skyline
« Reply #53 on: December 15, 2011, 04:15:08 PM »
The local Fox station in Dallas interviewed a retired official (38 years HS and college and a darn good official) and viewed the film with him. He pointed out the legal touching, the illegal blocking and the fact the mechanics were wrong for the official to move in front of another official.


It was a good interview and the official was not pointing fingers or anything, just explaining what occurred.

Is there a link for this?

Thanks,

Offline TXMike

  • *
  • Posts: 8773
  • FAN REACTION: +229/-269
  • When you quit learning you quit living

Offline TxSkyBolt

  • *
  • Posts: 2007
  • FAN REACTION: +45/-46
Re: Southlake-Skyline
« Reply #55 on: December 15, 2011, 04:30:57 PM »
+1 for the interviewer.  He did a great job and had great questions.  The councilman however, evaded the tough questions.

Best regards,

Brad

Offline psv

  • *
  • Posts: 279
  • FAN REACTION: +14/-14
Re: Southlake-Skyline
« Reply #56 on: December 15, 2011, 04:32:32 PM »
Thanks for posting that. 

I didnt watch the Caraway interview..... no reason to, i knew he wouldnt have anything intelligent to say.

BP1911

  • Guest
Re: Southlake-Skyline
« Reply #57 on: December 16, 2011, 06:25:03 AM »
This sounds like a re-election campaign!  I think he needs Skyline football parent votes.  cRaZy

Offline TexLJ

  • *
  • Posts: 35
  • FAN REACTION: +2/-0
Re: Southlake-Skyline
« Reply #58 on: December 16, 2011, 09:57:35 AM »
I didnt watch the Caraway interview..... no reason to, i knew he wouldnt have anything intelligent to say.

This is, after all, the same guy who gave Michael Vick a key to the city and lied to the police about a domestic disturbance at his home. He is looking for something to make his voters forget his own transgressions.

tx29

  • Guest
Re: Southlake-Skyline
« Reply #59 on: December 17, 2011, 12:56:56 AM »
Why does the F get a free pass in all of this discussion?  He should have had touching and illegal blocking help being the off side official. Only the S did his job here, with a butt in his face at that,  and now he's guilty by association.

110

  • Guest
Re: Southlake-Skyline
« Reply #60 on: December 17, 2011, 08:38:17 AM »
I must chime in here to say that I do not like the mechanics used, nor the way the ones in place were applied.

I don't know what the keys are, here.  Up here in the frozen North, our short-kick mechanics vary depending on the crew size, but we never have more than two on each line (kick, restraining), and each member of the crew is assigned a number of kick-team players. (Back-side officials would have the interior k-team players).

In this case, the officials working the near-side line halfway down (the one who moved and probably ought not to have) should have been following two kick-team members to pick up the illegal blocks. (I assume that the NCAA has the illegal block parameter for Kick-team members, as we do up here.)

As said earlier, this is a crew effort, or ought to be.
The restraining-line official on the near side (where the kick is coming down) should hold the line and be largely/entirely responsible for watching the ball and determining who touched what, where. That leaves six officials to cover blocking and legal/illegal tactics.

Ultimately, I agree with previous statements: this is one of those things that MUST be discussed at pregame chatters. It is the entire crew's responsibility to cover these plays correctly, and we - as officials - should know that the most contentious situations must be covered in all pre-game assignments ... and doubly so with playoffs, due to the increased import and scrutiny.